Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revert "hiding adaptive form vertical tabs until multi-level support … #1144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Revert "hiding adaptive form vertical tabs until multi-level support … #1144

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

barshat7
Copy link
Contributor

@barshat7 barshat7 commented Oct 9, 2023

…is enabled FORMS-9435"

This reverts commit 4545f10.

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@pankaj-parashar pankaj-parashar merged commit 283779c into develop Oct 9, 2023
9 checks passed
@pankaj-parashar pankaj-parashar deleted the revert_hiding-vertical_tabs branch October 9, 2023 10:23
@pankaj-parashar pankaj-parashar added this to the 45 milestone Nov 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pankaj-parashar pankaj-parashar pankaj-parashar approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
45
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@barshat7 @pankaj-parashar