Binary encoding of webIDL

[fgmccabe]

This is a draft of a spec for encoding webIDL in a binary format.
To be viewed as an adjunct to the eventual spec for host bindings

[littledan]

Cc @Ms2ger

[binji]

It's hard to see where this differs from #21. Can you make your changes a PR against the refresh branch so it's easier to diff?

[fgmccabe]

will do. my klutziness I guess

…

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 12:31 PM Ben Smith ***@***.***> wrote: It's hard to see where this differs from #21 <#21>. Can you make your changes a PR against the refresh branch so it's easier to diff? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#22 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACAL0DBU9fkiOpS5E-3Ju_iunG6hgytiks5vdlMqgaJpZM4cblLW> .

-- Francis McCabe SWE

[lukewagner]

I can't reconstruct how, but somehow me merging #21 merged this PR too? Anyhow, now we have proposals/host-bindings/binding.bs and everything else in proposals/webidl-bindings.

[fgmccabe]

Yes I messed something up. TBH that was my fit ever pr

On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 5:49 PM Luke Wagner ***@***.***> wrote: I can't reconstruct how, but somehow me merging #21 <#21> merged this PR too? Anyhow, now we have proposals/host-bindings/binding.bs and everything else in proposals/webidl-bindings. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#22 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACAL0KvtO1pK7TxxDyzRp_cZWmYmTOtEks5vdp2ngaJpZM4cblLW> .

-- Francis McCabe SWE

[lukewagner]

No worries, it's definitely confusing when starting out. Maybe create a new PR that just moves binding.bs to the webidl-bindings subdir and we can use that one to discuss?