Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: component field visibility public #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2023

Conversation

jdrueckert
Copy link
Member

Newer Java versions are stricter with regards to access restrictions when using reflection.
This affects in particular the serialization of non-public fields in our component classes.
For this reason, we decided to exclude non-public component fields from serialization and refactor all non-public component fields to be public instead to ensure not breaking any game and especially saving/loading behavior.

A future module overhaul may have a more detailed look into the components and make considerate decisions to use non-public fields.

Relates to MovingBlocks/Terasology#5191

@jdrueckert jdrueckert added Size: S Small effort likely only affecting a single area and requiring little to no research Topic: Stabilization Requests, Issues and Changes related to improving stablity and reducing flakyness Type: Refactoring Request for or implementation of pure and automatic refactorings, e.g. renaming, to improve clarity labels Dec 5, 2023
@soloturn soloturn merged commit df7fc3a into develop Dec 13, 2023
11 checks passed
@soloturn soloturn deleted the refactor/component-field-visibility-public branch December 13, 2023 07:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Size: S Small effort likely only affecting a single area and requiring little to no research Topic: Stabilization Requests, Issues and Changes related to improving stablity and reducing flakyness Type: Refactoring Request for or implementation of pure and automatic refactorings, e.g. renaming, to improve clarity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants