Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename integration to resources in our codebase #1370

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

kenxu95
Copy link
Contributor

@kenxu95 kenxu95 commented May 24, 2023

Describe your changes and why you are making these changes

This is just a combination of all the previous renaming PRs from #1335 to #1341, rebased onto latest main and with the merge conflicts resolved. I accidentally merged those into rc_v033 last sunday which was a mistake, hence this gigantic PR.

Testing:

  • Have run against the integration test suite and inspected the UI after manual QA tests.

Related issue number (if any)

ENG-2780

Loom demo (if any)

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have created a descriptive PR title. The PR title should complete the sentence "This PR...".
  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have included a small demo of the changes. For the UI, this would be a screenshot or a Loom video.
  • If this is a new feature, I have added unit tests and integration tests.
  • I have run the integration tests locally and they are passing.
  • I have run the linter script locally (See python3 scripts/run_linters.py -h for usage).
  • All features on the UI continue to work correctly.
  • Added one of the following CI labels:
    • run_integration_test: Runs integration tests
    • skip_integration_test: Skips integration tests (Should be used when changes are ONLY documentation/UI)

resource_id: uuid.UUID = Field(alias="integration_id")
parameters: Union[str, UnionExtractParams]

class Config:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @kenxu95 confirming these are for fields preserved in database?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correct!

@kenxu95 kenxu95 added the skip_integration_test Skips required integration test (only documentation/UI changes) label May 25, 2023
@kenxu95
Copy link
Contributor Author

kenxu95 commented May 25, 2023

Ran the integration tests locally.

@kenxu95 kenxu95 merged commit ac649b2 into main May 25, 2023
@kenxu95 kenxu95 deleted the rename_refactor branch May 25, 2023 02:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip_integration_test Skips required integration test (only documentation/UI changes)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants