Added WPS on top of WRF, and updated both to v4.2 #5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Alex Margolin <alex.margolin@huawei.com>
|
@baberlevi FYI |
codeandkey
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2020
Whenever attempting to use any ncurses functionality within cscope, a
page fault would result within the ncurses library.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff7fad3cf in termattrs_sp () from .../lib/libncursesw.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7fad3cf in termattrs_sp () from .../lib/libncursesw.so.6
#1 0x00007ffff7faa794 in _nc_setupscreen_sp () from .../lib/libncursesw.so.6
#2 0x00007ffff7fa614c in newterm_sp () from .../lib/libncursesw.so.6
#3 0x00007ffff7fa65b9 in newterm () from .../lib/libncursesw.so.6
#4 0x00007ffff7fa2970 in initscr () from .../lib/libncursesw.so.6
#5 0x0000000000403dc2 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7fffffffcea8) at main.c:574
This is due to a conflict between libtinfo.so and libtinfow.so. Both are
linked into cscope:
$ ldd $(which cscope)
/bin/bash: .../lib/libtinfo.so.6: no version information available (required by /bin/bash)
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff5dbcb000)
libncursesw.so.6 => .../lib/libncursesw.so.6 (0x00007f435cc69000)
libtinfo.so.6 => .../lib/libtinfo.so.6 (0x00007f435cc2c000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f435ca29000)
libtinfow.so.6 => .../lib/libtinfow.so.6 (0x00007f435c9e8000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f435cca7000)
Specifically linking libtinfow.so instead of libtinfo.so resolves the
issue.
All instances of '...' above represent the path to the installed ncurses
for Spack.
snehring
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2023
1. support version 3.1.3, which now depends on sundials@6 2. support version 3.1.2:, which broke the two patch files and therefore the two patch files have been replaced by more flexible filter_file() commands inside a patch() function. 3. rename the variant for python extension from using the package name "+pyuqtk" to the more standard "+python" 4. add maintainers @omsai and the upstream developer @bjdebus who offered to help with the spack packaging. 5. swig should only be a build-time dependency. swig is only necessary until @:3.1.0 6. confirmed python dependencies are correct by inspecting imports, subset python dependencies type to build, run, and confirmed all 31 build-time tests pass including the 9 python tests: ```console $ spack env create uqtk-dev $ spack add uqtk@3.1.3 $ spack install --test root && cat $(spack location -i uqtk)/.spack/install-time-test-log.txt ==> Testing package uqtk-3.1.3-nok6fut ==> [2023-04-19-14:56:25.005361] Running build-time tests ==> [2023-04-19-14:56:25.005536] RUN-TESTS: build-time tests [check] ==> [2023-04-19-14:56:25.009543] '/home/omsai/src/spack/opt/spack/linux-pureos10-skylake/gcc-10.2.1/gmake-4.4.1-b6g4apmfvxz3bn4eabh37dehcrg65fj7/bin/make' '-j4' '-n' 'test' ==> [2023-04-19-14:56:25.014903] '/home/omsai/src/spack/opt/spack/linux-pureos10-skylake/gcc-10.2.1/gmake-4.4.1-b6g4apmfvxz3bn4eabh37dehcrg65fj7/bin/make' '-j4' 'test' Running tests... /home/omsai/src/spack/opt/spack/linux-pureos10-skylake/gcc-10.2.1/cmake-3.26.3-zjmsfz23j5l4ytniz26uzvxonlu5qebr/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process Test project /tmp/omsai/spack-stage/spack-stage-uqtk-3.1.3-nok6fut47h42cnaau7wkoohgqy5f2qqa/spack-build-nok6fut Start 1: ArrayReadAndWrite Start 2: ArrayDelColumn Start 3: Array1DMiscTest Start 4: Array2DMiscTest 1/31 Test #1: ArrayReadAndWrite ................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 5: ArraySortTest 2/31 Test #2: ArrayDelColumn ................... Passed 0.01 sec Start 6: MultiIndexTest 3/31 Test #3: Array1DMiscTest .................. Passed 0.01 sec Start 7: CorrTest 4/31 Test #4: Array2DMiscTest .................. Passed 0.01 sec Start 8: QuadLUTest 5/31 Test #5: ArraySortTest .................... Passed 0.02 sec Start 9: MCMC2dTest 6/31 Test #6: MultiIndexTest ................... Passed 0.01 sec Start 10: MCMCRandomTest 7/31 Test #8: QuadLUTest ....................... Passed 0.02 sec Start 11: MCMCNestedTest 8/31 Test #10: MCMCRandomTest ................... Passed 0.02 sec Start 12: Deriv1dTest 9/31 Test #12: Deriv1dTest ...................... Passed 0.01 sec Start 13: SecondDeriv1dTest 10/31 Test #13: SecondDeriv1dTest ................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 14: GradHessianTest 11/31 Test #11: MCMCNestedTest ................... Passed 0.03 sec Start 15: GradientPCETest 12/31 Test #14: GradHessianTest .................. Passed 0.01 sec Start 16: PCE1dTest 13/31 Test #15: GradientPCETest .................. Passed 0.01 sec Start 17: PCEImplTest 14/31 Test #16: PCE1dTest ........................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 18: PCELogTest 15/31 Test #18: PCELogTest ....................... Passed 0.01 sec Start 19: Hessian2dTest 16/31 Test #19: Hessian2dTest .................... Passed 0.01 sec Start 20: BCS1dTest 17/31 Test #20: BCS1dTest ........................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 21: BCS2dTest 18/31 Test #21: BCS2dTest ........................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 22: LowRankRegrTest 19/31 Test #22: LowRankRegrTest .................. Passed 0.01 sec Start 23: PyModTest 20/31 Test #17: PCEImplTest ...................... Passed 0.07 sec Start 24: PyArrayTest 21/31 Test #23: PyModTest ........................ Passed 0.08 sec Start 25: PyArrayTest2 22/31 Test #25: PyArrayTest2 ..................... Passed 0.30 sec Start 26: PyQuadTest 23/31 Test #24: PyArrayTest ...................... Passed 1.44 sec Start 27: PyBCSTest1D 24/31 Test #26: PyQuadTest ....................... Passed 1.68 sec Start 28: PyBCSTest2D 25/31 Test #27: PyBCSTest1D ...................... Passed 1.66 sec Start 29: PyBADPTest 26/31 Test #7: CorrTest ......................... Passed 3.43 sec Start 30: PyRegressionTest 27/31 Test #28: PyBCSTest2D ...................... Passed 1.50 sec Start 31: PyGalerkinTest 28/31 Test #9: MCMC2dTest ....................... Passed 3.90 sec 29/31 Test #29: PyBADPTest ....................... Passed 1.66 sec 30/31 Test #30: PyRegressionTest ................. Passed 1.72 sec 31/31 Test #31: PyGalerkinTest ................... Passed 1.63 sec 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 31 Total Test time (real) = 5.35 sec ==> [2023-04-19-14:56:30.382797] '/home/omsai/src/spack/opt/spack/linux-pureos10-skylake/gcc-10.2.1/gmake-4.4.1-b6g4apmfvxz3bn4eabh37dehcrg65fj7/bin/make' '-j4' '-n' 'check' ==> [2023-04-19-14:56:30.385983] Target 'check' not found in Makefile ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on Spack's WRF package by ResearchIT, I was able to build both WRF and WPS of the latest (v4.2) version, and I'd to share the changes I made to achieve this. I hope this will also end up in Spack upstream and help others as well. This also addresses a unique issue with the latest GCC v10+, where additional flags are required.
One (hidden) comment: seems that the WPS build depends on access to WRF's staging directory, and I didn't find a good way to achieve this with Spack. My solution assumes that (a) WRF is installed with "--keep-stage" and the staging directory is kept, (b) WPS's staging directory is at the same location and (c) there's only one WRF staging directory there (my solution just grabs the first one found there).