Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CO2 network #148

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Sep 28, 2021
Merged

Add CO2 network #148

merged 16 commits into from
Sep 28, 2021

Conversation

fneum
Copy link
Member

@fneum fneum commented Jul 7, 2021

Regionally resolve CO2 storage and add pipeline transport network because geological storage potential, CO2 utilisation sites and CO2 capture sites may be separated.

Simplifications

  • Ignore retrofitting of the natural gas network as required pressures are too high (80-160 bar vs <80 bar).
  • Ignore other modes of CO2 transport (ship, road, rail).
  • Assume bidirectional pipes (like for H2 network currently).

Remaining TODOs

  • extra_functionality for allowed sequestration potential
  • add regionally resolved CO2 sequestration potentials (coordinate with @lisazeyen) -> Add rule building regional CO2 sequestration potentials pypsa-eur#585
  • network topology from electricity network (see Biomass transport #73)
  • additional cost if submarine based on underwater_fraction?
  • "process emissions CC", "gas for industry CC", and "solid biomass for industry CC" should be nodally resolved. As minimal version, a link is added to each local CO2 store (if nodally resolved) that allows the copperplated carbon capture to be distributed freely to local CO2 stores.

@fneum fneum requested a review from lisazeyen August 6, 2021 13:55
Copy link
Collaborator

@lisazeyen lisazeyen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fneum Looks great! I think only the color for CO2 pipeline was missing. Feel free to change it to another color. We can add the CO2 sequestration potentials in a separate PR or would you prefer to add it directly on this branch?

@fneum
Copy link
Member Author

fneum commented Sep 27, 2021

Thanks for having a look and finding the missing colour. I would add the regionally resolved sequestration potentials in a separate PR.

@fneum fneum merged commit ec04d79 into master Sep 28, 2021
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants