-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feedback F13 (issue 6, TM): Section V.0.4: It is not clear why there are three empty rows. #355
Comments
The reason for these three empty rows comes from the three rows providing mappings on |
@csnyulas Maybe what Natalie is suggesting here for the second part " epo:ProcurmentProcessInformation epo:isCompetitionTerminated in conjunction epo:hasAwardStatus", is that maybe we should consider representing this information through epo:ProcurementProcessInformation. As the property epo:isCompetitionTerminated has the description: "No further contracts will be awarded in this procedure. Additional Information: This can be instantiated in the post award phase. PIN for Competition needs to be signaled. This field can be used even if no contracts are awarded in the contract award notice. This corresponds in eForms to BT-756 PIN Competition Termination." Moreover, epo:ProcurementProcessInformation is connected with an epo:Lot through epo:concernsLot, and as I can understand epo:Contract is connected with an epo:Lot with epo:includesLot. |
Clarification from @muricna : Use two mappings to express the fact that the competition is terminated (Xpath: and and one mapping when the competition was NOT terminated (Xpath: |
Section V.0.4: It is not clear why there are three empty rows.
The fact that the contest is terminated without an award can be made by indicated epo:ProcurmentProcessInformation epo:isCompetitionTerminated in conjunction epo:hasAwardStatus …clos-nw which is in the rdf but not in the mapping
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: