-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question regarding the correct listID values #interproc #380
Comments
Following the discussion we had in today's OUC (OUC 23-02-2023) considering this issue, I would like to ask because I am unsure if I got it right if this issue will be addressed within the v3.2.0 or later with the v4.0.0 release. |
Good afternoon, this issue will be addressed with the v4.0.0 release since the scope for v3.2.0 was already closed some weeks ago and this release is about to be published shortly (pending to fix some technical issues). We are analyzing these inconsistencies in the codelist elements and will provide more information here after the conclusion of the analysis. Kind Regards, |
Hello @delgajc Thank you for your answer. Can you please provide us with a list containing the exact listID values per codelist expected in version 3.1.0 and 3.2.0 to avoid further misconceptions? It would also be nice if you could update the technical handbook because, as it is right now, it is not clear what are the correct values. |
Dear Konstantinos, please find below a table with the right listID values per codelist expected in version 3.1.0 and 3.2.0. We will fix the errors in the technical handbook and in the schematron files for 3.2.0, but bear in mind that currently the codelists maintained by ESPD Team are not validating the listID (this attribute is not included in the genericode files). This validation will be included in a future release. <style> </style>
Kind Regards, |
Thank you! @delgajc |
What about ProcedureType? |
there were some mistakes in the table I previously sent. Please find below the correct listID values for all the codelists: We are working to fix all the discrepancies in the documentation and ESPD artifacts to be included in next release 3.2.0. Dear @Nikanoras, ProcedureType is an obsolete codelist no longer maintained in ESPD in versions 3.x.x. Kind regards,
|
Fix ESPD v3.2.0 with #380 Validation for GitHub ESPD-EDM
Hello @Nikanoras , Related the codelist "ProcedureType", the proper name is actually "ProcurementProcedureType" from the EU Vocabularies. For the next release, you will find the element "ProcedureCode" with the attribute "listID" assigned to a Dummy value. You can already check this in the master branch, folder xml-examples. Kind regards, |
Hello, The ESPD version 3.2.0 has been released with a broader solution for this github issue. We reviewed all the codelists listID values in XSL file, generic code files, XSLT files, XML files and Schematron files as well. We also updated the listID values in the online documentation. With all that being said, this issue is resolved and closed. Kind regards, |
Hello ESPD team,
It seems that some of the examples (snippets) that are included in the technical handbook have different listID attribute values for certain elements compared to the respective Schematron rules. For instance, according to the technical handbook, the correct @listID value for cbc:PropertyGroupType is "property-group-type"
But the relevant Schematron rule demands the @listID value for this element to be equal to "PropertyGroupType". Can you clarify please what are the correct listID values for those elements?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: