-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Part IV: Selection criteria, C: Technical and professional ability (CA`s) #287
Comments
Hi, many thanks for all your questions and inputs. We will check your inputs and provide an answer as soon as possible. Thank you! |
Thank you for your reply and all the answers. |
Hi all, (@AJDAKOST , @ec-mcs ) We have been analysing and checking the possibility of adding the requirement window as optional in the criteria proposed above: • Subcontracting proportion It could be possible to add a requirement optional by using a cardinality of 0..n. However, it would be useful to continue the analysis if additional information on business needs regarding this addition could be provided. Find below an example with the subcontracted proportion criteria. Note that the cardinality is 0..n to allow the optional use. The element UUID is not provided since it would be provided once agreed on the inclusion. Moreover, we have checked the example pointed out in the first comment of the issue “For supply contracts: certificates by quality control institutes” and it includes a requirement with a cardinality of 1. It means that is required and not optional. Do you think that in this case, it should have a cardinality of 0..n? |
Hello,
we forward your suggestion to our IT service and we are waiting for replay.
Best regards,
Ajda
From: hricolor ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 11:40 AM
To: ESPD/ESPD-EDM ***@***.***>
Cc: Ajda Kostanjšek ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [ESPD/ESPD-EDM] Part IV: Selection criteria, C: Technical and professional ability (CA`s) (#287)
Hi all, ***@***.***<https://github.com/AJDAKOST> , @ec-mcs<https://github.com/ec-mcs> )
We have been analysing and checking the possibility of adding the requirement window as optional in the criteria proposed above:
• Subcontracting proportion
• For supply contracts: samples, descriptions or photographs without certification of authenticity
• For supply contracts: samples, descriptions or photographs with certification of authenticity
• For supply contracts: certificates by quality control institutes
It could be possible to add a requirement optional by using a cardinality of 0..n. However, it would be useful to continue the analysis if additional information on business needs regarding this addition could be provided. Find below an example with the subcontracted proportion criteria. Note that the cardinality is 0..n to allow the optional use. The element UUID is not provided since it would be provided once agreed on the inclusion.
[image]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/60606496/124899782-bce93300-dfe0-11eb-90a2-129b9136a8b4.png>
Moreover, we have checked the example pointed out in the first comment of the issue “For supply contracts: certificates by quality control institutes” and it includes a requirement with a cardinality of 1. It means that is required and not optional.
[image]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/60606496/124898679-b4dcc380-dfdf-11eb-96d1-46d126fa3770.png>
Do you think that in this case, it should have a cardinality of 0..n?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#287 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKLGB7RSYA2M5K73EW7YD2DTWVW7NANCNFSM4TJ2ZEAQ>.
|
Hello, I`m very sorry for really late response. Your solution (that in this case, it should have a cardinality of 0..n) is acceptable for us. Thank you very much. Best regards, Ajda |
Greetings, Could you answer our last question? Thanks. |
Hello, we confirm commented Requirement Group for criterion 'For works contracts: technicians or technical bodies to carry out the work' (work-tech) is alright with a cardinality of 1. Best regards, Ajda |
Thank you for your comments. This will be fixed in a future ESPD release. |
Hi, Could you please explain what is the purpose of this field on EO's side? Thank you and best regards, |
Good afternoon, |
Hi, Thank you for the clarification. Best regards, Ajda |
Good afternoon, |
CA`s side
Part IV: Selection criteria, C: Technical and professional ability
Criteria:
Subcontracting proportion
For supply contracts: samples, descriptions or photographs without certification of authenticity
For supply contracts: samples, descriptions or photographs with certification of authenticity
For supply contracts: certificates by quality control institutes
We suggest adding window Requirement as non-obligatory data, as it is used for example in Criteria: For works contracts: technicians or technical bodies to carry out the work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: