Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Object" definition, "with" in titles, fix level of "Working with Examples" #4050

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

handrews
Copy link
Member

Define capital-O "Object" to make it clear why it is only occasionally capitalized. I complained about some of these being lower-cased in 3.1.1 and 3.2.0 and will fix those when forward-porting. For whatever reason, they were not changed in 3.0.4, so there's nothing to fix here other than adding the definition.

Use lowercase "with" in titles consistently (it was more common than capitalized "With". This is one of those rules that is different depending on whose style guide you use- about half the major guides say always lowercase, the other say always captial. We were using lowercase more often.

Also, fix "Working with Examples" to be a subsection of the Example Object as otherwise it breaks the pattern of all of the headings of its level being Object definitions. I remember messing with this a lot when I first posted that PR and either I just missed this or I had some reason I have now forgotten to do it this way.

Define capital-O "Object" to make it clear why it is only occasionally
capitalized.

Use lowercase "with" in titles consistently (it was more common than
capitalized "With".  This is one of those rules that is different
depending on whose style guide you use- about half the major guides
say always lowercase, the other say always captial.  We were using
lowercase more often.

Also, fix "Working with Examples" to be a subsection of the
Example Object as otherwise it breaks the pattern of all of the
headings of its level being Object definitions.  I remember messing
with this a lot when I first posted that PR and either I just
missed this or I had some reason I have now forgotten to do it
this way.
@handrews handrews added the editorial Wording and stylistic issues label Aug 26, 2024
@handrews handrews added this to the v3.0.4 milestone Aug 26, 2024
@handrews handrews requested a review from a team August 26, 2024 16:38
@handrews handrews changed the title "Object" def, "with" in titles, fix level "Object" definition, "with" in titles, fix level of "Working with Examples" Aug 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mikekistler mikekistler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. 👍

@ralfhandl ralfhandl merged commit 14f0605 into OAI:v3.0.4-dev Aug 27, 2024
1 check passed
@handrews handrews deleted the obj-with branch August 28, 2024 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial Wording and stylistic issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants