"Object" definition, "with" in titles, fix level of "Working with Examples" #4050
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Define capital-O "Object" to make it clear why it is only occasionally capitalized. I complained about some of these being lower-cased in 3.1.1 and 3.2.0 and will fix those when forward-porting. For whatever reason, they were not changed in 3.0.4, so there's nothing to fix here other than adding the definition.
Use lowercase "with" in titles consistently (it was more common than capitalized "With". This is one of those rules that is different depending on whose style guide you use- about half the major guides say always lowercase, the other say always captial. We were using lowercase more often.
Also, fix "Working with Examples" to be a subsection of the Example Object as otherwise it breaks the pattern of all of the headings of its level being Object definitions. I remember messing with this a lot when I first posted that PR and either I just missed this or I had some reason I have now forgotten to do it this way.