Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rpm: 4.17.1 -> 4.18.0 #193474

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

rpm: 4.17.1 -> 4.18.0 #193474

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2022

Conversation

LeSuisse
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0

Fixes CVE-2021-35937, CVE-2021-35938 and CVE-2021-35939.

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
    • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Got a bunch of failures, some packages have broken source URLs or are already broken on master.

@LeSuisse
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like Darwin both x86_64 and aarch64 are unhappy, not sure why.

@LeSuisse LeSuisse deleted the rpm-4.18.0 branch September 29, 2022 12:03
@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Oct 9, 2022

They are:

checking for mkfifoat... no
configure: error: function required by rpm

That's clearly new requirement by the package, sounds very much like an upstream issue.

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Oct 9, 2022

Anyway, let me poke upstream: rpm-software-management/rpm#2222

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants