Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add radial branches test system #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2024
Merged

add radial branches test system #69

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

jd-lara
Copy link
Member

@jd-lara jd-lara commented Jan 15, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (46cd9a4) 92.66% compared to head (deadb58) 92.71%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #69      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.66%   92.71%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        3122     3143      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits         2893     2914      +21     
  Misses        229      229              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.71% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
src/library/psitest_library.jl 96.00% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Copy link
Collaborator

@GabrielKS GabrielKS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, assuming the failing PowerSimulationsDynamics check can be explained

@jd-lara jd-lara merged commit e6ae57d into main Jan 16, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@jd-lara jd-lara deleted the jd/add_radial_system branch June 25, 2024 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants