Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move the websocket client into part of the atproto package #84

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

MarshalX
Copy link
Owner

@MarshalX MarshalX commented Jul 6, 2023

No description provided.

@MarshalX MarshalX merged commit 1248241 into main Jul 6, 2023
7 checks passed
@MarshalX MarshalX deleted the fix-ws-client branch July 6, 2023 19:35
@MarshalX
Copy link
Owner Author

MarshalX commented Jul 7, 2023

@CodiumAI-Agent

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Moving the websocket client into the atproto package
  • 🔍 Description and title: No
  • 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • Minimal and focused: Yes, the PR is focused on moving the websocket client into the atproto package and does not include unrelated changes.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No, the PR does not introduce possible security concerns or issues. The changes are mostly related to moving existing code and do not involve handling user input or database operations.

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General PR suggestions: The PR lacks a description which is important for understanding the context and reasoning behind the changes. It would be beneficial to add unit tests to ensure the moved websocket client works as expected within the atproto package.

  • 🤖 Code suggestions:

    • relevant file: atproto/ws_client/transport.py
      suggestion content: Consider adding error handling for the case where the message type is neither 'websocket.send' nor 'websocket.close' in the read method. This will prevent unexpected behavior and make the code more robust. [important]

    • relevant file: atproto/ws_client/transport.py
      suggestion content: In the _run method, it would be better to log the exception before sending the close message. This will help in debugging if any error occurs. [medium]

    • relevant file: atproto/ws_client/_ping.py
      suggestion content: The create method in both PingManager and AsyncPingManager classes can be moved to the base class (PingManagerBase) to avoid code duplication. [medium]

    • relevant file: atproto/firehose/client.py
      suggestion content: Consider handling the case where the scheme is not 'ws' or 'wss' and the 'upgrade' header is not 'websocket'. This will make the code more robust and prevent unexpected behavior. [important]

How to use

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' to ask for a new review after you update the PR.
You can also tag me and ask any question, for example '@CodiumAI-Agent is the PR ready for merge?'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants