lib, zebra: Allow for interface deletion when kernel event happens #5009
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8954/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8954/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8954/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8954/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8954/artifact/TOPOU1804/MemoryLeaks/ Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsTopology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8954/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8954/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8954/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8954/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base1 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8959/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsCLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base1 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
donaldsharp
force-pushed
the
interface_deletion
branch
from
c4ff9fa
to
cbe89e9
Compare
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
donaldsharp
force-pushed
the
interface_deletion
branch
from
f7d0d20
to
734ea1d
Compare
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
donaldsharp
force-pushed
the
interface_deletion
branch
from
734ea1d
to
796bb3c
Compare
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedFedora 29 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/F29RPMCHECK/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8960/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8960/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/CENTOS7RPM/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-8960/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/TOPOU1804/MemoryLeaks/ Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsFedora 29 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/F29RPMCHECK/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8960/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8960/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/CENTOS7RPM/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-8960/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8960/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base1 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedFedora 29 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/F29RPMCHECK/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundIPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 14.04: Failed (click for details)RFC Compliance Test ANVL-OSPF-3.1 failing: Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8961/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8961/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/CENTOS7RPM/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-8961/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/TOPOU1804/MemoryLeaks/ Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsFedora 29 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/F29RPMCHECK/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundIPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 14.04: Failed (click for details)RFC Compliance Test ANVL-OSPF-3.1 failing: Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8961/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8961/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/CENTOS7RPM/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-8961/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8961/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base1 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-8962/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/F29RPMCHECK/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8962/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/CENTOS7RPM/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8962/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/TOPOU1604/MemoryLeaks/ Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-8962/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/F29RPMCHECK/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt Fedora 29 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8962/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Failed (click for details)CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/CENTOS7RPM/ErrorLog/log_package_start.txt CentOS 7 rpm pkg check: No useful log foundTopotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8962/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8962/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base1 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-8963/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8963/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8963/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8963/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8963/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8963/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms
Topology Tests memory analysis: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8963/artifact/TOPOU1604/MemoryLeaks/ Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsTopology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1604-8963/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 16.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8963/artifact/TOPOU1604/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOU1804-8963/test Topology Tests failed for Topology tests on Ubuntu 18.04 amd64: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8963/artifact/TOPOU1804/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPOI386-8963/test Topology Tests failed for Topotest tests on Ubuntu 16.04 i386: see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8963/artifact/TOPOI386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt CLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base1 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
We were storing the interface description irrelevant of whether or not it was a newlink or dellink. This makes no sense. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When zebra gets a callback from the kernel that an interface has actually been deleted *and* the end users has not configured the interface, then allow for deletion of the interface from zebra. This is especially important in a docker environment where containers and their veth interfaces are treated as ephermeal. FRR can quickly have an inordinate amount of interfaces sitting around that are not in the kernel and we have no way to clean them up either. My expectation is that this will cause a second order crashes in upper level protocols, but I am not sure how to catch these and fix them now ( suggestions welcome ). There are too many use patterns and order based events that I cannot know for certain that we are going to see any at all, until someone sees this problem as a crash :( I do not recommend that this be put in the current stabilization branch and allow this to soak in master for some time first. Testing: sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link add vethdj type veth peer name vethjd sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link add vethaa type veth peer name vethab sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief" Interface Status VRF Addresses --------- ------ --- --------- dummy1 down default enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24 enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24 enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24 enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24 lo up default 10.22.89.38/32 vethaa down default vethab down default vethdj down default vethjd down default virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24 virbr0-nic down default sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link set vethaa up sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link set vethab up sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link del vethdj sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief" Interface Status VRF Addresses --------- ------ --- --------- dummy1 down default enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24 enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24 enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24 enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24 lo up default 10.22.89.38/32 vethaa up default vethab up default virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24 virbr0-nic down default sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link del vethaa sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief" Interface Status VRF Addresses --------- ------ --- --------- dummy1 down default enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24 enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24 enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24 enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24 lo up default 10.22.89.38/32 virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24 virbr0-nic down default sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link add vethaa type veth peer name vethab sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief" Interface Status VRF Addresses --------- ------ --- --------- dummy1 down default enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24 enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24 enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24 enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24 lo up default 10.22.89.38/32 vethaa down default vethab down default virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24 virbr0-nic down default sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show run" Building configuration... Current configuration: ! frr version 7.2-dev frr defaults datacenter hostname donna.cumulusnetworks.com log stdout no ipv6 forwarding ! ip route 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.209.1 ip route 192.168.4.0/24 blackhole ip route 192.168.5.0/24 192.168.209.1 ip route 192.168.6.0/24 192.168.209.1 ip route 192.168.7.0/24 99.99.99.99 nexthop-vrf EVA ip route 192.168.8.0/24 192.168.209.1 ip route 4.5.6.7/32 12.13.14.15 ! interface dummy1 ip address 12.13.14.15/32 ! interface vethaa description FROO ! line vty ! end sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link del vethaa sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief" Interface Status VRF Addresses --------- ------ --- --------- dummy1 down default enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24 enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24 enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24 enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24 lo up default 10.22.89.38/32 vethaa down default virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24 virbr0-nic down default sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show run" Building configuration... Current configuration: ! frr version 7.2-dev frr defaults datacenter hostname donna.cumulusnetworks.com log stdout no ipv6 forwarding ! ip route 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.209.1 ip route 192.168.4.0/24 blackhole ip route 192.168.5.0/24 192.168.209.1 ip route 192.168.6.0/24 192.168.209.1 ip route 192.168.7.0/24 99.99.99.99 nexthop-vrf EVA ip route 192.168.8.0/24 192.168.209.1 ip route 4.5.6.7/32 12.13.14.15 ! interface dummy1 ip address 12.13.14.15/32 ! interface vethaa description FROO ! line vty ! end Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Start the conversion to allow zapi interface callbacks to be controlled like vrf creation/destruction/change callbacks. This will allow us to consolidate control into the interface.c instead of having each daemon read the stream and react accordingly. This will hopefully reduce a bunch of cut-n-paste stuff Create 4 new callback functions that will be controlled by lib/if.c create -> A upper level protocol receives an interface creation event The ifp is brand spanking newly created in the system. up -> A upper level protocol receives a interface up event This means the interface is up and ready to go. down -> A upper level protocol receives a interface down destroy -> A upper level protocol receives a destroy event This means to delete the pointers associated with it. At this point this is just boilerplate setup for future commits. There is no new functionality. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Switch the zclient->interface_add functionality to have everyone use the interface create callback in lib/if.c Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
For all the places we have a zclient->interface_up convert them to use the interface ifp_up callback instead. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Convert the callback of the interface_delete to the new ifp callback. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
In an upper level protocol, delete the interface on notification about deletion. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
donaldsharp
force-pushed
the
interface_deletion
branch
from
796bb3c
to
26f8f6f
Compare
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-8970/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Checkout code: Successful with additional warningsCLANG Static Analyzer Summary
No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base1 Static Analyzer issues remaining.See details at |
sworleys
reviewed
Sep 23, 2019
| @@ -39,4 +39,10 @@ extern void pbr_send_pbr_map(struct pbr_map_sequence *pbrms, | |||
| struct pbr_map_interface *pmi, bool install); | |||
|
|
|||
| extern struct pbr_interface *pbr_if_new(struct interface *ifp); | |||
|
|
|||
| extern int pbr_ifp_create(struct interface *ifp); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you put these in a pbr_interface.c file and then call a pbr_interface_init()? Just to be more consistent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why? Not all daemons have a xxx_interface.c file nor is it clear to me that we need another file in pbr to hold 4 functions. What are you hoping to do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess I wrongly assumed this was standardized. I'm fine with whatever as long as we are consistent moving forward.
There also exists a *_vrf.c file in many of the daemons doing the same thing. Should this be in *_zebra.c as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No each daemon has taken a somewhat different approach here. I'm fixing a bug here not necessarily trying to standardize behavior. And yes I realize I go in and poke stuff around a bunch. Not sure I'm interested in standardizing this across all daemons( which really is the correct long term behavior ). As that I think this needed to be applied a bunch of places and I didn't want to have to make it work right across them.
riw777
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2019
pguibert6WIND
requested changes
Sep 25, 2019
|
I could make some testing with that release, more specifically on network namespace focus. and it seems it is ok . |
pguibert6WIND
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2019
This was referenced Jan 13, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When zebra gets a callback from the kernel that an interface has
actually been deleted and the end users has not configured
the interface, then allow for deletion of the interface from zebra.
This is especially important in a docker environment where containers
and their veth interfaces are treated as ephermeal. FRR can quickly
have an inordinate amount of interfaces sitting around that are
not in the kernel and we have no way to clean them up either.
My expectation is that this will cause a second order crashes
in upper level protocols, but I am not sure how to catch these
and fix them now ( suggestions welcome ). There are too many
use patterns and order based events that I cannot know for certain
that we are going to see any at all, until someone sees this problem
as a crash :( I do not recommend that this be put in the current
stabilization branch and allow this to soak in master for some time
first.
Testing:
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link add vethdj type veth peer name vethjd
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link add vethaa type veth peer name vethab
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief"
Interface Status VRF Addresses
dummy1 down default
enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24
enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24
enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24
enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24
lo up default 10.22.89.38/32
vethaa down default
vethab down default
vethdj down default
vethjd down default
virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24
virbr0-nic down default
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link set vethaa up
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link set vethab up
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link del vethdj
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief"
Interface Status VRF Addresses
dummy1 down default
enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24
enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24
enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24
enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24
lo up default 10.22.89.38/32
vethaa up default
vethab up default
virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24
virbr0-nic down default
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link del vethaa
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief"
Interface Status VRF Addresses
dummy1 down default
enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24
enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24
enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24
enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24
lo up default 10.22.89.38/32
virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24
virbr0-nic down default
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link add vethaa type veth peer name vethab
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief"
Interface Status VRF Addresses
dummy1 down default
enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24
enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24
enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24
enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24
lo up default 10.22.89.38/32
vethaa down default
vethab down default
virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24
virbr0-nic down default
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show run"
Building configuration...
Current configuration:
!
frr version 7.2-dev
frr defaults datacenter
hostname donna.cumulusnetworks.com
log stdout
no ipv6 forwarding
!
ip route 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.209.1
ip route 192.168.4.0/24 blackhole
ip route 192.168.5.0/24 192.168.209.1
ip route 192.168.6.0/24 192.168.209.1
ip route 192.168.7.0/24 99.99.99.99 nexthop-vrf EVA
ip route 192.168.8.0/24 192.168.209.1
ip route 4.5.6.7/32 12.13.14.15
!
interface dummy1
ip address 12.13.14.15/32
!
interface vethaa
description FROO
!
line vty
!
end
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo ip link del vethaa
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show int brief"
Interface Status VRF Addresses
dummy1 down default
enp0s3 up default 10.0.2.15/24
enp0s8 up default 192.168.209.2/24
enp0s9 up default 192.168.210.2/24
enp0s10 up default 192.168.212.4/24
lo up default 10.22.89.38/32
vethaa down default
virbr0 up default 192.168.122.1/24
virbr0-nic down default
sharpd@donna ~/frr4> sudo vtysh -c "show run"
Building configuration...
Current configuration:
!
frr version 7.2-dev
frr defaults datacenter
hostname donna.cumulusnetworks.com
log stdout
no ipv6 forwarding
!
ip route 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.209.1
ip route 192.168.4.0/24 blackhole
ip route 192.168.5.0/24 192.168.209.1
ip route 192.168.6.0/24 192.168.209.1
ip route 192.168.7.0/24 99.99.99.99 nexthop-vrf EVA
ip route 192.168.8.0/24 192.168.209.1
ip route 4.5.6.7/32 12.13.14.15
!
interface dummy1
ip address 12.13.14.15/32
!
interface vethaa
description FROO
!
line vty
!
end
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com