Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

6.0: bfdd: fix multi hop hash lookup #3218

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2018

Conversation

rzalamena
Copy link
Member

Summary

Use the proper multi hop hash for matching multi hop peers.

Spotted by Dmitrii Turlupov (@ak503).


This is a back port to the 6.0 version.

Related Issue

#3169

Related PR

#3172

Components

bfdd.

Use the proper multi hop hash for matching multi hop peers.

Spotted by Dmitrii Turlupov.

Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2055ea0)
@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-5716/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.


CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 3218, comparing to Git base SHA 09fdff5

No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base

4 Static Analyzer issues remaining.

See details at
https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-5716/artifact/shared/static_analysis/index.html

@eqvinox eqvinox added the review & merge me look at me! label Oct 23, 2018
@eqvinox eqvinox requested a review from qlyoung October 23, 2018 16:13
@qlyoung qlyoung merged commit 73c497e into FRRouting:stable/6.0 Oct 23, 2018
@rzalamena rzalamena deleted the 60-bfdmhoplookup branch November 9, 2018 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants