Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reinstate fix get all ancestors in a thread #43518

Merged

Conversation

kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor

@kmbcook kmbcook commented Jun 12, 2024

Details

This pull request corrects an error getting all ancestors in a thread. The steps for reproducing this issue are no longer relevant because report preview actions are no longer displayed as parent actions in a thread. The root cause of this issue still exists, which causes inconsistency and confusion in the code. The purpose of this PR is to clean up the code.

See proposals in all three issues:
#41519 (comment)
#43175 (comment)
#43190 (comment)

Fixed Issues

$ #41519
$ #43175
$ #43190
PROPOSAL: #41519 (comment)

Tests

The primary test required for this change is covered by a revised unit test, which is included in this PR. Other testing is just to ensure that there are no regressions.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Covered by revised unit test.

QA Steps

Covered by revised unit test.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android-Native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Android-Chrome.mov
iOS: Native
IOS-Native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
IOS-Safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Mac-Chrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Mac-Desktop.mov

…t.parentReportID to ancestor.report.reportID.
…4-fix/issue-41519-get-all-ancestors"

This reverts commit 01c418d, reversing
changes made to 4c86fbf.
@kmbcook kmbcook requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2024 01:19
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from rushatgabhane and removed request for a team June 12, 2024 01:19
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 12, 2024

@rushatgabhane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Jun 16, 2024

@kmbcook im not able to load the header of any room/workspace

Screenshot 2024-06-16 at 16 07 20

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Jun 17, 2024

@rushatgabhane it is working for me. I did just merge main and resolve a conflict in ThreadDivider, and I cleared my cache, but I'm not sure that any of those things would affect the problem you are seeing. Here are my screenshots.

Screenshot 2024-06-17 at 9 07 40 AM

Screenshot 2024-06-17 at 9 08 26 AM

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@kmbcook this PR breaks trips -

image

The parent action is shown instead of trip data

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Jun 26, 2024

@rushatgabhane it looks like it is difficult for me to look into the problem you are talking about with trips because I am not on the travel beta. I'd be glad to look at the problem further is someone could add kevincook13@gmail.com to the beta. Since travel is still in beta do you want to go ahead with this PR even if it does break trips, and let trips work around this change? Or, do you want to wait until travel is out of beta and ensure that this PR does not break trips then?

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Jul 15, 2024

@rushatgabhane I think that problem you pointed out with trips is fixed now.

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

reviewing

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@kmbcook travel looks good 👍

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: invoice detail is duplitcated

Screen.Recording.2024-07-26.at.06.36.51.mov

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Jul 26, 2024

@rushatgabhane I just merged main and took a video of opening invoice detail on main, and on this PR. Both videos look identical.

This PR:

PR.mov

Main:

Main.mov

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@kmbcook the bug i mentioned is different. It has the payment details show two times. This is for expenses that have been approved

Steps:

  1. Submit an expense from account A
  2. Login as the approver from account B
  3. Approve the expense.
image

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Jul 29, 2024

@rushatgabhane I still can't reproduce the problem you are showing me. Here is what I see. (I just merged main again)

Account A (Kevin) submitted an expense.
Account B (Fred) approved the expense.
Video of Fred's view:

Fred.mov

Video of Kevin's view:

Kevin.mov

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Jul 29, 2024

@rushatgabhane I wonder if this problem is specific to invoices. I see in the first video you sent that the header displays "Rushat's Expenses" and "Invoices". In my videos the header displays differently.

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Jul 29, 2024

my bad! yeah could be for invoices

  1. green +
  2. send invoice

if you don't see this, enable all betas in permissions.ts

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Jul 29, 2024

I see it!

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Jul 30, 2024

@rushatgabhane the same problem exists on main.

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

the same problem exists on main

yeah you're right.

image

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Aug 2, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native image
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native image image
iOS: mWeb Safari image image
MacOS: Chrome / Safari image image image image

Same bug present on main

image image image
MacOS: Desktop image

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from marcochavezf August 4, 2024 22:57
@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Aug 4, 2024

@kmbcook LGTM!

i understand that the unit tests cover everything but please add some screenshots as they are required

@marcochavezf
Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts

@kmbcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmbcook commented Aug 5, 2024

@rushatgabhane videos are now posted, and conflicts resolved.

Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf marcochavezf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@marcochavezf marcochavezf merged commit 9aa6134 into Expensify:main Aug 6, 2024
17 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 6, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 7, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcochavezf in version: 9.0.18-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.18-10 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants