Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD] Revert "Refactor code to improve unread marker logic" #25785

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham commented Aug 23, 2023

Straight revert #18637

The PR caused two deploy blockers:
$ #25776
$ #25673

Slack discussion was here

Did some basic testing of this feature to make sure it's working as it was before:

web.mov

@roryabraham roryabraham requested a review from a team as a code owner August 23, 2023 16:29
@roryabraham roryabraham self-assigned this Aug 23, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from cristipaval and removed request for a team August 23, 2023 16:30
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 23, 2023

@cristipaval Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title Revert "Refactor code to improve unread marker logic" [HOLD] Revert "Refactor code to improve unread marker logic" Aug 23, 2023
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham I can't repro this one on the revert branch so I think the infinite loop we are seeing there is related to these changes.

@cristipaval cristipaval removed their request for review September 30, 2023 20:24
@roryabraham roryabraham closed this Nov 8, 2023
@roryabraham roryabraham deleted the revert-18637-monil-fixNewMarkerLine branch November 8, 2023 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants