Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ensure processing of markup in comment #24319

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023

Conversation

samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor

@samh-nl samh-nl commented Aug 9, 2023

Details

Previously, markup was not always processed in a comment if the length exceeded a certain threshold. This PR ensures that markup is always processed.

Fixed Issues

$ #21817
PROPOSAL: #21817 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open any report
  2. Type a message that ends with a user mention and where the message length exceeds the 10,000 limit
  3. Verify that an error indicator appears
  4. Reduce the message length until the error indicator disappears, but ensure the user mention is still present
  5. Post the message
  6. Verify that the user mention is correctly processed (i.e. is not plaintext)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Open any report
  2. Type a message that ends with a user mention and where the message length exceeds the 10,000 limit
  3. Verify that an error indicator appears
  4. Reduce the message length until the error indicator disappears, but ensure the user mention is still present
  5. Post the message
  6. Verify that the user mention is correctly processed (i.e. is not plaintext)

QA Steps

  1. Open any report
  2. Type a message that ends with a user mention and where the message length exceeds the 10,000 limit
  3. Verify that an error indicator appears
  4. Reduce the message length until the error indicator disappears, but ensure the user mention is still present
  5. Post the message
  6. Verify that the user mention is correctly processed (i.e. is not plaintext)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Web.Screen.Recording.2023-08-09.at.15.36.03.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
mWeb.Chrome.Screen.Recording.2023-08-09.at.16.48.28.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
mWeb.Safari.Screen.Recording.2023-08-09.at.16.09.31.mp4
Desktop
Desktop.Screen.Recording.2023-08-09.at.15.36.30.mp4
iOS
Native.iOS.Screen.Recording.2023-08-09.at.16.00.34.mp4
Android
Native.Android.Screen.Recording.2023-08-09.at.16.45.54.mp4

@samh-nl samh-nl requested a review from a team as a code owner August 9, 2023 14:57
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from sobitneupane and removed request for a team August 9, 2023 14:57
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 9, 2023

@sobitneupane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Untitled.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.14.39.16.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.14.16.34.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.14.07.55.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.14.13.01.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.14.38.17.mov

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

NAB: We can use better error message instead of 10,000+. For example: 'Comment Too Long: Max length is 10,000 characters.'

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Aug 11, 2023

Perhaps a shorter version of that? Comment exceeds 10,000 characters

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Aug 14, 2023

Bump

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

I have added by suggestion here. But it is not a blocker, so waiting for @neil-marcellini to have a look.

@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

Ha good news, we have a marketing team that can help us figure out the best error message text. I'll request a review from them on the issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At around 57 seconds in the web testing video some plain text is removed and the comment no longer exceeds the max length. Next, one character is added to the plain text, and you would expect that the comment would again exceed the max length, but it does not. Why? I find that confusing.

Oh, maybe this is caused by the debounce on the comment length? In that case it's probably ok. Or maybe we can remove the debounce and make sure it's still performant?

debounce((comment, onExceededMaxCommentLength) => {
const newCommentLength = ReportUtils.getCommentLength(comment);
setCommentLength(newCommentLength);
onExceededMaxCommentLength(newCommentLength > CONST.MAX_COMMENT_LENGTH);
}, CONST.TIMING.COMMENT_LENGTH_DEBOUNCE_TIME),

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, maybe this is caused by the debounce on the comment length?

Yup. It is caused by debounce.

@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

The error message we should use is "The maximum comment length is 10,000 characters." @samh-nl will you please work on getting it updated, and maybe see if it's okay to remove the debounce? Let's only remove it if we're sure it won't cause regressions, otherwise I'm fine with how it currently is.

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Aug 18, 2023

The error message we should use is "The maximum comment length is 10,000 characters." @samh-nl will you please work on getting it updated,

Thank you, I'm just waiting for the Spanish translation and I've reached out to @grafaelg for this on Slack.

and maybe see if it's okay to remove the debounce? Let's only remove it if we're sure it won't cause regressions, otherwise I'm fine with how it currently is.

Regarding debouncing, it introduces noticeable lag on writing when removing it. The markdown isn't very performant unfortunately, I've previously compared it to other popular implementations in my proposal, which seem to be orders of magnitude faster than the homemade implementation used here. But perhaps there are specific reasons for the current implementation that I'm not aware of.

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Aug 18, 2023

Please see the latest commit.

@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane would you please test once more, just to be cautious, then message me on NewDot so I can merge it?

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

@samh-nl When window is resized, at some point the error message breaks into two line. Can we keep it in single line with ellipsis if it overflows.
Screenshot 2023-08-21 at 14 02 09

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Aug 21, 2023

@sobitneupane It now clamps to one line and adds ellipsis on overflow.

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update @samh-nl. Changes look good and test well.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-08-22.at.12.09.05.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-08-22.at.12.26.05.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-08-22.at.12.18.56.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-08-22.at.12.13.30.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-08-22.at.12.20.40.mov
Android

Screenshot_1692689904

Screenshot_1692689886

Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to go except the conflicts. Please DM me on NewDot when it's ready.

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Aug 28, 2023

Resolved the conflict, I will re-test now to ensure there's no problems.

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Aug 29, 2023

Confirming that it tests well. Sorry for the delay, had some difficulty building android.

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini changed the title fix: ensure processing of markup in comment [HOLD merge freeze] fix: ensure processing of markup in comment Aug 30, 2023
@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

Good to go but we have a merge freeze so we have to wait unfortunately.

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Sep 11, 2023

I have merged main into the branch and added a TS type.

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini changed the title [HOLD merge freeze] fix: ensure processing of markup in comment fix: ensure processing of markup in comment Sep 18, 2023
@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @samh-nl. Would you please fix the merge conflicts and then DM me and we can get this merged?

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Sep 19, 2023

I have merged main into the branch again.

@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

I'm still seeing conflicts @samh-nl ☹️

@samh-nl
Copy link
Contributor Author

samh-nl commented Sep 20, 2023

Merged again. It's due to TS types being added. If it occurs again I can put our type a line higher in the list, so any additions shouldn't cause a merge conflict.

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini merged commit c57c625 into Expensify:main Sep 21, 2023
13 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.3.73-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.73-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.3.74-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 1.3.74-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants