-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2024-10-17] [$250] Sign in - Account settings long loading if navigate via public room link & login as new account #48715
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @bfitzexpensify ( |
@bfitzexpensify FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors |
Checking in on the other issue here |
I am heading out of office until September 21st, so assigning a buddy to watch over this in my absence. Current status: confirming if the other PR caused this |
Current assignee @bfitzexpensify is eligible for the Bug assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Triggered auto assignment to @VictoriaExpensify ( |
This doesn't appear to be related to #47806 - I can repro with the changes from there reverted. It's probably a BE issue as there are no |
@bfitzexpensify, @VictoriaExpensify Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
Thanks for confirming @jjcoffee . I'm going to move this to internal since this sounds like a BE issue |
Not overdue |
Is this bug specific to the public rooms flow and on Android native only? If so, that was a project in #vip-vsb, and I think @jasperhuangg might be good to offer insight into that. |
@jjcoffee The cc @marcochavezf IIRC you implemented this flow, it seems like we're not calling ReconnectApp when the user is signed in from the public room, which I think could be preventing us from loading their personal details. Under normal circumstances when we sign up a new user we do call it: So I believe this issue lies in the front-end and can be worked on externally, I think we just need to figure out why we're not calling |
The solution looks fine to me @lakchote. |
@wildan-m I have a few more questions.
I couldn't find any indication on this in the issue's comments. Did you try it out yourself, by removing that code? |
I'm not sure about this case, can you suggest possible reproduction steps? without that code the user will still redirected to concierge by default Kapture.2024-10-04.at.02.46.51.mp4
Yes, please watch the first and second case in this video, Kapture.2024-10-04.at.02.56.50.mp4The 1st case, concierge is unbolded, that is expected since that chat is selected Looking at the proposal root cause #44728 (comment) that issue is originally created to handle system chat, but I couldn't find anything about |
Understood, thanks for testing. @wildan-m's proposal LGTM. |
📣 @wildan-m 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! Offer link |
@wildan-m @lakchote @bfitzexpensify @thesahindia this issue is now 4 weeks old, please consider:
Thanks! |
creating the PR ... |
@thesahindia The PR is ready #50278 thanks! |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.47-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-10-17. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
Regressions arised. See #50278 (comment). |
@lakchote, @thesahindia I've created this draft PR #50629 in case you are curious and also want to test. Currently I only revert the I can't reproduce other deploy blockers that potentially come from our PR:
Let me know if you can reproduce the two issues mentioned above as I conduct more testing. |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 9.0.30-9
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): ponikarchuks+106924@gmail.com
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Issue found when executing PR #48144
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Account settings loads fine
Actual Result:
Account settings long loading
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6595301_1725625415082.A_clear_anonymous_user_records_after_login.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @bfitzexpensifyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: