[$500] Android - BA - Android App crashes when starting Onfido

[kbecciv]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.34-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: not able to check production
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause- Internal Team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

1. Open Android App
2. Login with Expensifail account
3. Create workspace or go to existing one
4. Select 'Bank Account' > Connect with Plaid
5. Select Region Bank and follow the flow for Onfido (Company - Expensify, first name - First, last name - Last)

Expected Result:

Onfido started after Personal Information page completed

Actual Result:

Android App crashes when starting Onfido

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6362892_1706735260543.Android-Onfido-Crash.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01dccccca284d16c78
• Upwork Job ID: 1755346472180178944
• Last Price Increase: 2024-02-07
• Automatic offers:
• mkhutornyi | Contributor | 0

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @hayata-suenaga (Engineering), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[kbecciv]

We think that this bug might be related to #wave6-collect-submitters
CC @greg-schroeder

[greg-schroeder]

Hmm this might be handled by Callstack or should be - @mountiny can you confirm if this fits in the VBA refactor project or can be merged in?

[francoisl]

Wondering if it has to do anything with #35440, we merged that yesterday to fix another crash on Android. Will try to troubleshoot.

[francoisl]

I can reproduce the crash on the current production version, using the VERIFYING flow from https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/342. Going to remove the blocker label and keep this open so we can look and fix.

cc @mkhutornyi if you have an idea how to fix.

[mkhutornyi]

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

App crashes when start onfido flow on android release build

What is the root cause of that problem?

Crash log:

   Process: com.expensify.chat.adhoc, PID: 1047
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to start activity ComponentInfo{com.expensify.chat.adhoc/com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoActivity}: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unable to create call adapter for class io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Single
    for method h.b
	at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:3449)
	at android.app.ActivityThread.handleLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:3601)
	at android.app.servertransaction.LaunchActivityItem.execute(LaunchActivityItem.java:85)
	at android.app.servertransaction.TransactionExecutor.executeCallbacks(TransactionExecutor.java:135)
	at android.app.servertransaction.TransactionExecutor.execute(TransactionExecutor.java:95)
	at android.app.ActivityThread$H.handleMessage(ActivityThread.java:2066)
	at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:106)
	at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:223)
	at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:7656)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
	at com.android.internal.os.RuntimeInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(RuntimeInit.java:592)
	at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:947)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unable to create call adapter for class io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Single
    for method h.b
	at fd.f9.i(SourceFile:40)
	at mv.q.b(SourceFile:400)
	at retrofit2.Retrofit.c(SourceFile:25)
	at mv.r0.invoke(SourceFile:45)
	at java.lang.reflect.Proxy.invoke(Proxy.java:1006)
	at com.onfido.api.client.$Proxy18.b(Unknown Source)
	at com.onfido.api.client.f.d(SourceFile:17)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.network.OnfidoApiService.getSDKConfig$onfido_capture_sdk_core_release(Unknown Source:6)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.internal.config.SDKConfigRepository.<init>(SourceFile:28)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.internal.config.SDKConfigRepository_Factory.newInstance(Unknown Source:2)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.internal.config.SDKConfigRepository_Factory.get(SourceFile:1)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.internal.config.SDKConfigRepository_Factory.get(SourceFile:2)
	at mj.a.get(SourceFile:14)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoPresenterInitializer_Factory.get(SourceFile:1)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoPresenterInitializer_Factory.get(SourceFile:2)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoPresenter_Factory.get(Unknown Source:58)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoPresenter_PresenterAssistedFactory_Impl.create(SourceFile:1)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoActivity$presenter$2.invoke(SourceFile:1)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoActivity$presenter$2.invoke(SourceFile:2)
	at sq.l.getValue(SourceFile:21)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoActivity.getPresenter(Unknown Source:2)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoActivity.setupPresenterWith(Unknown Source:38)
	at com.onfido.android.sdk.capture.ui.OnfidoActivity.onCreate(SourceFile:60)
	at android.app.Activity.performCreate(Activity.java:8000)
	at android.app.Activity.performCreate(Activity.java:7984)
	at android.app.Instrumentation.callActivityOnCreate(Instrumentation.java:1309)
	at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:3422)
	... 11 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Single return type must be parameterized as Single<Foo> or Single<? extends Foo>
	at nv.i.get(SourceFile:117)
	at retrofit2.Retrofit.a(SourceFile:33)
	at mv.q.b(SourceFile:381)
	... 36 more

This is another case of crash after enabling proguard

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

# Keep generic signature of RxJava3 (R8 full mode strips signatures from non-kept items).
-keep,allowobfuscation,allowshrinking class io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Flowable
-keep,allowobfuscation,allowshrinking class io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Maybe
-keep,allowobfuscation,allowshrinking class io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Observable
-keep,allowobfuscation,allowshrinking class io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Single

add this to proguard-rules.pro

reference:
https://github.com/square/retrofit/blob/3770704de89233c1240699392baa7198d8b63bff/retrofit-adapters/rxjava3/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/retrofit2-rxjava3-adapter.pro#L1-L5

---

Or this might be more general solution:

# R8 full mode strips generic signatures from return types if not kept.
-if interface * { @retrofit2.http.* public *** *(...); }
-keep,allowoptimization,allowshrinking,allowobfuscation class <3>

reference: https://github.com/square/retrofit/pull/3886/files

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

bump @onfido/react-native-sdk to latest version (10.6.0)
Why?
proguard issue fixed in onfido android sdk 19.5.0 (https://github.com/onfido/onfido-android-sdk/releases/tag/19.5.0)
react-native sdk 10.6.0 is the one which bumped android sdk to 19.5.x

[mountiny]

@mkhutornyi what is the changelog for the onfido bump?

[mkhutornyi]

RN sdk changelog can be found here (after 8.3.0), mainly version bump of native sdks

Breaking changes:

• breaking changes from version bump of native sdks
• Added theme selection to the SDK configuration

Android sdk changelog is here (after 18.0.1)

Breaking changes:

• The compile sdk version has been upgraded to 33 to meet Google Play's target API level requirement
• Replaced com.google.android.play:core library with a more specific com.google.android.play:feature-delivery library for Dynamic Feature Module compatibility
• Added Proguard rules for Retrofit to support R8 full mode according to the R8 FAQ (this fixes our issue)
• Added support for the NFC required flow

iOS sdk changelog is here (after 29.0.0)

Breaking changes:

• Due to a change introduced by Apple in March 2023 with iOS v16.0, PACE-only documents can no longer be read by iOS devices installed with iOS 16 (or newer). To minimize integration complexity and instability with future releases of iOS, Onfido is removing support for NFC-PACE.

[mountiny]

The android compile sdk looks the most dangerous but we are already on 34

App/android/build.gradle

Line 7 in b64b408

compileSdkVersion = 34

so maybe we should be good to upgrade this

@francoisl @hayata-suenaga what do you think?

[hayata-suenaga]

@mountiny could you explain why we need to upgrade the sdk version?

[mkhutornyi]

I explained detail in my proposal (alternative solution)

[francoisl]

Sounds good to me. The compile SDK version doesn't sound like a concern if we already target a higher version.

[mountiny]

Sorry my comment meant to say: we should be good to upgrade @onfido/react-native-sdk since the compile sdk does not have to be bumped.

@hayata-suenaga would you like to make this external and assign @mkhutornyi if you happy with their proposal?

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01dccccca284d16c78

[mkhutornyi]

@mountiny or @hayata-suenaga can you please generate build again? Just pushed fix

[hayata-suenaga]

building...

[mkhutornyi]

@hayata-suenaga I think you added label in the issue. Should be in PR

[hayata-suenaga]

ahhhh this is the issue! not PR 😭

[hayata-suenaga]

building for real 😭

[mkhutornyi]

PR is ready for review

[melvin-bot]

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @allroundexperts, @mkhutornyi, @hayata-suenaga eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @lschurr (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[hayata-suenaga]

The PR was deployed to production two weeks ago.

Melvin forgot to remove the reviewing label so we missed this.

C+ payment for @allroundexperts and contributor payment for @mkhutornyi

[lschurr]

Ah, got it!

@allroundexperts you're paid via newdot correct?

[lschurr]

Payment for $500 has been sent via Upwork for @mkhutornyi

[lschurr]

Payment summary:

• Contributor @mkhutornyi $500 (paid via Upwork)
• Contributor+ @allroundexperts $500 (to be requested in newdot)

[JmillsExpensify]

$500 approved for @allroundexperts