[Awaiting Payment - 22nd Dec] [$500] User Account Swapping Issue in IOU When Splitting Bills

[lanitochka17]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.2-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

1, Navigate to FAB
2, Select "Request Money."
3, Enter the desired amount
4, Add the recipient's email
5, Enable the "Add Split" option

Expected Result:

The user profile should not be swapped

Actual Result:

The user profile is swapped when splitting a bill in IOU between two users

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6287208_1700660684896.swapped.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01d923d8de5457372f
• Upwork Job ID: 1727385176024190976
• Last Price Increase: 2023-11-29
• Automatic offers:
• s-alves10 | Contributor | 27935989

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01d923d8de5457372f

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @trjExpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @allroundexperts (External)

[abzokhattab]

cannot reproduce it on the latest main

[s-alves10]

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

User avatars are swapped in IOU preview when splitting bills

What is the root cause of that problem?

When splitting a bill, users are added in order they are selected. In that order, they are displayed in MoneyRequestPreview. But the SplitBillAndOpenReport API returns sorted particiapantAccountIDs as you can see below

This is the root cause

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

We can show the participants avatars sorted by its accountID or name(login) In MoneyRequestPreview
Update

App/src/components/ReportActionItem/MoneyRequestPreview.js

Line 154 in 4952c39

const participantAvatars = OptionsListUtils.getAvatarsForAccountIDs(participantAccountIDs, props.personalDetails);

to

    const participantAvatars = OptionsListUtils.getAvatarsForAccountIDs(participantAccountIDs, props.personalDetails);
    const sortedParticipantAvatars = _.sortBy(participantAvatars, (avatar) => avatar.name);
    // const sortedParticipantAvatars = _.sortBy(participantAvatars, (avatar) => avatar.id);

And use sortedParticipantAvatars instead of participantAvatars

Result

31732.mp4

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

[trjExpensify]

Very interesting! It's pretty minor, but I agree it's a little jarring to see the switch around because of the default avatars changing completely. Is it not possible to keep the same selected order on the split preview?

[allroundexperts]

Very interesting! It's pretty minor, but I agree it's a little jarring to see the switch around because of the default avatars changing completely. Is it not possible to keep the same selected order on the split preview?

@trjExpensify It's definitely possible but we'll need to change this from the backend then. I think its better to standardise this by sorting the results. As such, what @s-alves10 proposed above looks like a better solution IMO.

[trjExpensify]

But does that mean the order will not match the confirmation page order though? and they still switch around?

[allroundexperts]

It will match the one coming from backend. And the switch won't happen.

[melvin-bot]

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

[trjExpensify]

It will match the one coming from backend. And the switch won't happen.

Great, so that's good then!

[allroundexperts]

Given we have an agreement, I think we are good to go with @s-alves10's proposal.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @robertjchen, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

[robertjchen]

Yep, this approach makes sense to me! 👍

[melvin-bot]

📣 @allroundexperts Please request via NewDot manual requests for the Reviewer role ($500)

[melvin-bot]

📣 @s-alves10 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app!

Offer link
Upwork job
Please accept the offer and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑‍💻
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖

[s-alves10]

@allroundexperts

PR is ready for review #32419

[s-alves10]

Pay date here would be 22 Dec @robertjchen

[allroundexperts]

Checklist

1. Continue personalDetails -> personalDetailsList migration #20328
2. https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/20328/files#r1431287393
3. N/A
4. A regression test would be helpful.

Regression test

1. Click on the FAB -> Request Money -> Enter amount & recipient -> Submit
2. On the screen that opens, observe the IOU preview message.

Verify that the order of avatars in the preview message does not change.

Do we 👍 or 👎 ?

[trjExpensify]

As this was caught by Applause in the regression testing and there's one to cover this flow, I don't think we need a new dedicated one for it personally.

Updating the title to note the 22nd as the payment date. Confirming those payments will be:

• $500 to @allroundexperts for the C+ review
• $500 to @s-alves10 for the fix - paid

[trjExpensify]

👋 @allroundexperts have you requested for this one?

[allroundexperts]

Requested. Feel free to close!

[robertjchen]

Thanks!

[JmillsExpensify]

$500 payment to @allroundexperts based on this comment.