Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #8231 from Expensify/marco-updatePRChecklist
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[No QA] update PR checklist
  • Loading branch information
MariaHCD authored Mar 21, 2022
2 parents 1e43356 + 2e4984c commit f5c49a0
Showing 1 changed file with 16 additions and 18 deletions.
34 changes: 16 additions & 18 deletions .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,33 +52,32 @@ This is a checklist for PR authors & reviewers. Please make sure to complete all
- [ ] MacOS / Desktop
- [ ] I verified there are no console errors (if there’s a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
- [ ] I followed proper code patterns (see [Reviewing the code](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/PR_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md#reviewing-the-code))
- [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. `toggleReport` and not `onIconClick`)
- [ ] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct english, and explained “why” the code was doing something instead of only explaining “what” the code was doing.
- [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained “why” the code was doing something instead of only explaining “what” the code was doing.
- [ ] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all `src/languages/*` files
- [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct english and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- [ ] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named “index.js”. All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [ ] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in [`STYLE.md`](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/STYLE.md#jsdocs)) were followed
- [ ] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [ ] I followed the guidelines as stated in the [Review Guidelines](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/PR_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md)
- [ ] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like `Avatar`, I verified the components using `Avatar` are working as expected)
- [ ] I verified all code is DRY
- [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js) are defined as such
- [ ] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [ ] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [ ] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [ ] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a `/** comment above it */`
- [ ] Any functional components have the `displayName` property
- [ ] The file is named correctly
- [ ] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [ ] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [ ] Any internal methods are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues
- [ ] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound
- [ ] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to `this` properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for `onClick={this.submit}` the method `this.submit` should be bound to `this` in the constructor)
- [ ] Any internal methods bound to `this` are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid `this.submit = this.submit.bind(this);` if `this.submit` is never passed to a component event handler like `onClick`)
- [ ] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [ ] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose and it is
- [ ] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [ ] A similar style doesn’t already exist
- [ ] The style can’t be created with an existing [StyleUtils](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/styles/StyleUtils.js) function
(i.e. `StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG`)
- [ ] The style can’t be created with an existing [StyleUtils](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/styles/StyleUtils.js) function (i.e. `StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG`)



Expand All @@ -99,33 +98,32 @@ This is a checklist for PR authors & reviewers. Please make sure to complete all
- [ ] MacOS / Desktop
- [ ] I verified there are no console errors (if there’s a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
- [ ] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see [Reviewing the code](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/PR_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md#reviewing-the-code))
- [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. `toggleReport` and not `onIconClick`).
- [ ] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct english, and explained “why” the code was doing something instead of only explaining “what” the code was doing.
- [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained “why” the code was doing something instead of only explaining “what” the code was doing.
- [ ] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all `src/languages/*` files
- [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct english and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- [ ] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named “index.js”. All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [ ] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in [`STYLE.md`](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/STYLE.md#jsdocs)) were followed
- [ ] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [ ] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the [Review Guidelines](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/PR_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md)
- [ ] I verified other components are not impacted by changes in this PR (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like `Avatar`, I verified the components using `Avatar` are working as expected)
- [ ] I verified all code is DRY
- [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js) are defined as such
- [ ] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [ ] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [ ] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [ ] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a `/** comment above it */`
- [ ] Any functional components have the `displayName` property
- [ ] The file is named correctly
- [ ] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [ ] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [ ] Any internal methods are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues
- [ ] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound
- [ ] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to `this` properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for `onClick={this.submit}` the method `this.submit` should be bound to `this` in the constructor)
- [ ] Any internal methods bound to `this` are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid `this.submit = this.submit.bind(this);` if `this.submit` is never passed to a component event handler like `onClick`)
- [ ] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [ ] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- [ ] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [ ] A similar style doesn’t already exist
- [ ] The style can’t be created with an existing [StyleUtils](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/styles/StyleUtils.js) function
(i.e. `StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG`)
- [ ] The style can’t be created with an existing [StyleUtils](https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/styles/StyleUtils.js) function (i.e. `StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG`)

### QA Steps
<!---
Expand Down

0 comments on commit f5c49a0

Please sign in to comment.