Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/sg 573 pose estimation #634

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Jan 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

BloodAxe
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@dagshub
Copy link

dagshub bot commented Jan 17, 2023

@BloodAxe BloodAxe marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2023 09:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@shaydeci shaydeci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!
Besides some little comments, my main suggestions, detailed inline are:

  • Regarding the way we handle transforms.I know we've yet to come up with a descent solution...but maybes better to handle transforms that are already implemented and can be resolved (which by itself, might impose a problem if we are allowing our users to resolve for example SegmentationTransform, but lets leave that for now..) by stating that non KeyPointsTransform are applied only on image, then we can reduce the amount of transforms we would need to reimplement simply for packing and unpacking items into the sample. See my suggestion inline, and let me know what you think (:
  • Pose estimation base dataset- so I think it would be a good idea to pull at least some of the class methods of the dataset which we can probably take use in, and form a base class. If you feel that for COCO everything is very specific, we can probably skip this part and as time progresses and we have more datasets, the common methods will be more apparent and we can form a base class.

See my other comments inline.

Copy link
Collaborator

@shaydeci shaydeci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@BloodAxe BloodAxe merged commit cadcfdd into master Jan 24, 2023
@BloodAxe BloodAxe deleted the feature/SG-573-pose-estimation branch January 24, 2023 11:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants