Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving multi-turn strategy #48

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rlundeen2
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Simple multi-turn update to make multi-turn better. Using basic models, they got confused over the objectives.
I tested this one over several rounds with and GPT-4 and mixtral 8x7b

There is still room for improvement but this was working fairly well

Tests

  • no new tests required
  • new tests added
  • existing tests adjusted

Documentation

  • no documentation changes needed
  • documentation added or edited
  • example notebook added or updated

@rlundeen2 rlundeen2 changed the title improving multi turn strategy Improving multi-turn strategy Feb 16, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 16, 2024

Test Results

114 tests  ±0   114 ✅ ±0   10s ⏱️ -1s
  1 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit df0f4b1. ± Comparison against base commit 83cca11.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

…th_objective.yaml

Co-authored-by: Roman Lutz <romanlutz13@gmail.com>
@rlundeen2 rlundeen2 merged commit a33a5d6 into main Feb 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@rlundeen2 rlundeen2 deleted the users/rlundeen/2_16_attacker_strategy branch February 16, 2024 23:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants