Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TSC meeting notes for 2/27/2020 #675

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion ASWF/tsc-meetings/2020-02-20.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# 02/06/2020
# 02/20/2020

### Attending:

Expand Down
61 changes: 61 additions & 0 deletions ASWF/tsc-meetings/2020-02-27.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
# 02/27/2020

### Attending:

* Cary Phillips
* Peter Hillman
* Larry Gritz
* Joseph Goldstone
* Kimball Thurston
* Nick Porcino
* Arkell Rasiah

### Discussion:

* Google Summer of Code: we've gotten a few inquiries; be on the
lookout for more.

* Release schedule: 2.5 sometime in the spring; 3.0 around siggraph.

* The VES Reference Platform will list OpenEXR 3.0 for 2021.

* #673 see #591

* #672 looks good, merged.

* #666 looks good, merged. Will go into 2.5

* #639 looks good, merged.

* #634 Kimball needs to unwind what he did.

* #591 @Lord-Kamina agreed to clean up the PR.

* #674 the solution is to remove OpenEXR_Viewers from the cmake build
process for the 2.5 release, and then remove it from the repo
entirely for the 3.0 release.

* 652 brew recipe for openexr may need to be updated?

* 648 won't fix.

* 646 should be fixed by #672

* 625 the intention was cut down number of Windows user errors, but
there's no consensus the right thing to do.

* 607 the answer is: don't do in-tree build.; clean up and try again.