Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix GHA CI after they upgraded nodejs #1779

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

cary-ilm
Copy link
Member

They upgraded to a version that requires a glibc newer than is in the pre-2023 ASWF containers.

See AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO#4324

The example build is failing, but it turns out the ci build step duplicates what happens in the validate_openexr_libs.sh script anyway, so I'm removing it from the workflow.

They upgraded to a version that requires a glibc newer than is in the
pre-2023 ASWF containers.

See AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO#4324

The example build is failing, but it turns out the ci build step
duplicates what happens in the validate_openexr_libs.sh script anyway,
so I'm removing it from the workflow.

Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>
@cary-ilm cary-ilm merged commit faf697f into AcademySoftwareFoundation:main Jul 24, 2024
32 checks passed
cary-ilm added a commit to cary-ilm/openexr that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2024
They upgraded to a version that requires a glibc newer than is in the
pre-2023 ASWF containers.

See AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO#4324

The example build is failing, but it turns out the ci build step
duplicates what happens in the validate_openexr_libs.sh script anyway,
so I'm removing it from the workflow.

Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>
cary-ilm added a commit to cary-ilm/openexr that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
They upgraded to a version that requires a glibc newer than is in the
pre-2023 ASWF containers.

See AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO#4324

The example build is failing, but it turns out the ci build step
duplicates what happens in the validate_openexr_libs.sh script anyway,
so I'm removing it from the workflow.

Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>
@cary-ilm cary-ilm mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
cary-ilm added a commit to cary-ilm/Imath that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2024
Same as AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr#1779

They upgraded to a version that requires a glibc newer than is in the pre-2023 ASWF containers.

See AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO#4324

The example build is failing, but it turns out the ci build step duplicates what happens in the validate_openexr_libs.sh script anyway, so I'm removing it from the workflow.

Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>
cary-ilm added a commit to cary-ilm/Imath that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2024
Similar to AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr#1779

They upgraded to a version that requires a glibc newer than is in the
pre-2023 ASWF containers.

See AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO#4324

Also, fix the PYTHONPATH for the python module test, apparently the
install dirctory of the module has changed.

Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>
cary-ilm added a commit to AcademySoftwareFoundation/Imath that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2024
Similar to AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr#1779

They upgraded to a version that requires a glibc newer than is in the
pre-2023 ASWF containers.

See AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO#4324

Also, fix the PYTHONPATH for the python module test, apparently the
install dirctory of the module has changed.

Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>
cary-ilm added a commit to AcademySoftwareFoundation/Imath that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
Similar to AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr#1779

They upgraded to a version that requires a glibc newer than is in the
pre-2023 ASWF containers.

See AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO#4324

Also, fix the PYTHONPATH for the python module test, apparently the
install dirctory of the module has changed.

Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <cary@ilm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant