Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workaround for PEtab problems with state-dependent noise models #1791

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2022

Conversation

dweindl
Copy link
Member

@dweindl dweindl commented May 3, 2022

PEtab does currently not allow observables in noiseFormula and AMICI cannot handle states in sigma expressions. Therefore, where possible, replace species occurring in the error model definition by observableIds.

See also #1788

PEtab does currently not allow observables in noiseFormula and AMICI
cannot handle states in sigma expressions. Therefore, where possible,
replace species occurring in the error model definition by observableIds.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1791 (de392f4) into develop (a6f9894) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head de392f4 differs from pull request most recent head b6167e5. Consider uploading reports for the commit b6167e5 to get more accurate results

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1791      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    72.95%   73.00%   +0.05%     
===========================================
  Files           71       71              
  Lines        12237    12238       +1     
===========================================
+ Hits          8927     8934       +7     
+ Misses        3310     3304       -6     
Flag Coverage Δ
cpp 74.36% <ø> (+0.08%) ⬆️
python 68.19% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
python/amici/petab_import.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/solver_cvodes.cpp 70.52% <0.00%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
src/sundials_matrix_wrapper.cpp 81.83% <0.00%> (+0.83%) ⬆️
src/exception.cpp 81.08% <0.00%> (+5.40%) ⬆️

Copy link
Member

@FFroehlich FFroehlich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test with Raia_CancerResearch2011 bechmark model? if gradients don't match for that model just ignore?

@FFroehlich
Copy link
Member

test with Raia_CancerResearch2011 bechmark model? if gradients don't match for that model just ignore failure?

@FFroehlich
Copy link
Member

test with Raia_CancerResearch2011 bechmark model? if llh value doesn't match just ignore for that model?

@dweindl
Copy link
Member Author

dweindl commented May 3, 2022

test with Raia_CancerResearch2011 bechmark model? if gradients don't match for that model just ignore?

In its current form, that one uses observables in noiseFormula, not states. So not a good test case (yet).

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 3, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@dweindl dweindl merged commit 32c6c42 into develop May 4, 2022
@dweindl dweindl deleted the petab_noise_species branch May 4, 2022 08:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants