Fix wrong array size in warnings

[dweindl]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1624 (f83f5c8) into develop (a915cc2) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1624      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    78.91%   78.93%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files           69       69              
  Lines        10713    10711       -2     
===========================================
+ Hits          8454     8455       +1     
+ Misses        2259     2256       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cpp	75.51% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
petab	66.72% <ø> (ø)
python	68.27% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/amici.cpp	73.43% <ø> (-0.41%)	⬇️
src/solver_cvodes.cpp	71.29% <0.00%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
src/exception.cpp	80.64% <0.00%> (+6.45%)	⬆️

[FFroehlich]

But indices can't be bigger than size()-1.

[dweindl]

But indices can't be bigger than size()-1.

"NaN value at index 0/0" looks pretty unintuitive to me... Can we then just drop the size?

[FFroehlich]

But indices can't be bigger than size()-1.

"NaN value at index 0/0" looks pretty unintuitive to me... Can we then just drop the size?

sounds reasonable, {NaN,Inf} value for %s[%i]?

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[sonarcloud]

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.