Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2023. It is now read-only.

Commit

Permalink
Update validation coverage docs after #49.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
aj-stein-gsa committed Jan 14, 2021
1 parent e433ea6 commit 35b135f
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion resources/validations/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ This format will allow for reviewers to collaborate and communicate improvements
- [ ] 4a Are the customer responsibilities clearly identified in the CIS-CRM Tab, as well as the SSP Controls (by checkbox selected and in the implementation description)? Are the CIS-CRM and SSP controls consistent for customer responsibilities? A sampling of seven controls involving customer roles is reviewed.
- [ ] 4b Does the Initial Authorizing Agency concur with the CRM (adequacy and clarity of customer responsibilities)?
- [ ] 5 Does the Roles Table (User Roles and Privileges) sufficiently describe the range of user roles, responsibilities, and access privileges?
- [ ] 6 In the control summary tables, does the information in the Responsible Role row correctly describe the required entities responsible for fulfilling the control?
- [X] 6 In the control summary tables, does the information in the Responsible Role row correctly describe the required entities responsible for fulfilling the control? (50% complete, control mapping will complete this work in 18F/fedramp-automation#51)
- [ ] 7 Is the appropriate Digital Identity Level selected?
- [ ] 8a Is the authorization boundary explicitly identified in the network diagram?
- [ ] 8b Does the CSO provide components to run on the client side?
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 35b135f

Please sign in to comment.