Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to generate passtickets off z/OS #3587

Open
1000TurquoisePogs opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Option to generate passtickets off z/OS #3587

1000TurquoisePogs opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@1000TurquoisePogs
Copy link
Member

Alternative or in addition to #3586

Some users wish to use APIML, and generate passtickets, but do so with the minimum resource consumption on z/OS possible.
Today, it appears the only option for this is to have APIML on z/OS in order for this code to execute
https://github.com/zowe/api-layer/blob/v3.x.x/common-service-core/src/main/java/org/zowe/apiml/passticket/PassTicketService.java

So I am looking for an enhancement to add a second passticket service implementation that runs without using SAF.
The passticket algorithm is documented here https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=passticket-incorporating-generator-algorithm-into-your-program and can run independent of z/OS as long as the key material is available.

This would allow APIML to run off z/OS, while still being able to generate passtickets.
It does not need to be the default. Just an option.

The enhancements will help adoption of APIML for users who were otherwise considering an alternative gateway technology to meet the requirement of running most of the code off-z/OS.

I am willing to help with the implementation, though my gateway development experience is limited.

@1000TurquoisePogs 1000TurquoisePogs added enhancement New feature or request new New issue that has not been worked on yet labels Jun 5, 2024
@balhar-jakub balhar-jakub added Priority: Medium size/M and removed new New issue that has not been worked on yet labels Jun 12, 2024
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants