Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quality control guidelines, filters, & meta-data #61

Open
wendtke opened this issue Jul 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Quality control guidelines, filters, & meta-data #61

wendtke opened this issue Jul 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers Meta-work Description, README, CI, documentation, test question Further information is requested
Projects

Comments

@wendtke
Copy link
Owner

wendtke commented Jul 20, 2019

Merged with #13 and #44

See here for quality control guidelines and suggested filters per MW application type.

Is it also possible to provide users with the number of segments lost due to each of these criterion for easy reporting? Rather than "dropping" segments, can we remove them from the main data and provide the user with information on the invalid segments? For example, share number of the segments lost in a study due to established quality control guidelines (see #13). This would be useful for manuscripts down the line.

Originally posted by @wendtke in #13 (comment)

@wendtke wendtke added enhancement New feature or request Meta-work Description, README, CI, documentation, test question Further information is requested good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jul 20, 2019
@wendtke wendtke added this to To do in psyphr Jul 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers Meta-work Description, README, CI, documentation, test question Further information is requested
Projects
psyphr
  
To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants