Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to Jest 19 #71

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 24, 2017
Merged

Upgrade to Jest 19 #71

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 24, 2017

Conversation

okonet
Copy link
Contributor

@okonet okonet commented Feb 23, 2017

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
build related change

Did you add tests for your changes?

N/A

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

N/A

@okonet
Copy link
Contributor Author

okonet commented Feb 23, 2017

@ev1stensberg could you please look into the failing tests? Something with mocks I guess.

@evenstensberg
Copy link
Member

Sure. Mind waiting 1:30h? I'm doing Google Hashcode right now

@evenstensberg
Copy link
Member

My guess is that you removed the rootpath, so it can't find relative paths to the mock folder

@okonet
Copy link
Contributor Author

okonet commented Feb 23, 2017

No, it was failing with the config in place. It's not needed in this form BTW since these are defaults.

@evenstensberg
Copy link
Member

checking them out now, giveme some mins

Copy link
Member

@evenstensberg evenstensberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm mergeit ✅

@okonet
Copy link
Contributor Author

okonet commented Feb 24, 2017

I'll rebase and merge.

@okonet okonet merged commit fe62523 into master Feb 24, 2017
@okonet okonet deleted the fix/update-jest branch February 24, 2017 08:55
evenstensberg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2017
* fix: Upgraded to Jest 19
* Removed unnecessary Jest config
* fix: temporary use absolute paths for mock requires
* build: Generate coverage report
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants