Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

whether the study factor needs to be considered? #45

Open
zhangy2361 opened this issue Nov 4, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

whether the study factor needs to be considered? #45

zhangy2361 opened this issue Nov 4, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@zhangy2361
Copy link

Thank you and your team for developing the curatedMetagenomicData package. I have encountered some confusion when using this package. Firstly, whether the relative abundance table has been standardized and does not need to consider the batch of the study? Is this the final relative abundance table?
Secondly, I downloaded a cancer data from different studies using curatedMetagenomicData, and whether the study factor needs to be considered when finding the significantly different microbiome using massLin. Or, what other analysis methods for finding the significantly different microbiome are recommended when using curatedMetagenomicData? Or, do I need to follow this tutorial (vignettes/Sex_metaanalysis_vignette.Rmd). Looking forward to your reply.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant