Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSCAL Tools and Libraries #1049

Closed
egyptiankarim opened this issue Nov 5, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1104
Closed

OSCAL Tools and Libraries #1049

egyptiankarim opened this issue Nov 5, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1104
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@egyptiankarim
Copy link

I'm hoping you all will consider including my open source side projects on your OSCAL Tools and Libraries page. Specifically:

  • control_freak - This tool seeks to provide folks with a searchable and easy-to-navigate reference for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. I built it using parsed content directly from the OSCAL repositories.
  • typist - This tool is "control_freak for NIST SP 800-60 content" (i.e., the NIST catalog of information classes and types and their provisional "security categorizations").
  • performatron - Like the others, but for NIST SP 800-181. I built this tool to help with performance planning and reviews for my diverse staff of cybersecurity professionals with expertise across the NICE framework.

typist and performatron are definitely OSCAL adjacent, but having that content available in an easy-to-use format has come in handy for me on many occasions. The "banner project", Risk Redux, is just generally my attempt to turn useful frameworks for thinking about cybersecurity (i.e., all the amazing NIST documentation out there) into practical web applications.

@aj-stein-nist
Copy link
Contributor

@egyptiankarim thanks for letting us know about your tools. For now, since control_freak is OSCAL specific, I will work on adding that to the tools page. PR incoming.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants