Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Model selection and results #2326

Closed
ferro07 opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Model selection and results #2326

ferro07 opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested Stale

Comments

@ferro07
Copy link

ferro07 commented Mar 1, 2021

Hey @glenn-jocher
Thank you for your great work.

Although I have done a lot of training for the S-M-L and X models, I always get better results in S and M each time. But theoretically, shouldn't I get higher results with the L and X model? (I tried it many times and more epochs).
My dataset is as follows: train 400 images with 1 class (400x300)
test 150 images (400x300).
How can we explain this scientifically, I could not reach a conclusion on this subject.
Thanks for your help.

@ferro07 ferro07 added the question Further information is requested label Mar 1, 2021
@wudashuo
Copy link
Contributor

wudashuo commented Mar 1, 2021

Your dataset is too small, the larger model will be under fitting.
400 images are not enough at all, you should use at least 5 or 10 times larger dataset.

@glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

glenn-jocher commented Mar 2, 2021

@ferro07 👋 Hello! Thanks for asking about improving training results. Most of the time good results can be obtained with no changes to the models or training settings, provided your dataset is sufficiently large and well labelled. If at first you don't get good results, there are steps you might be able to take to improve, but we always recommend users first train with all default settings before considering any changes. This helps establish a performance baseline and spot areas for improvement.

If you have questions about your training results we recommend you provide the maximum amount of information possible if you expect a helpful response, including results plots (train losses, val losses, P, R, mAP), PR curve, confusion matrix, training mosaics, test results and dataset statistics images such as labels.png. All of these are located in your project/name directory, typically yolov5/runs/train/exp.

We've put together a full guide for users looking to get the best results on their YOLOv5 trainings below.

Dataset

  • Images per class. ≥1.5k images per class recommended
  • Instances per class. ≥10k instances (labeled objects) per class total recommended
  • Image variety. Must be representative of deployed environment. For real-world use cases we recommend images from different times of day, different seasons, different weather, different lighting, different angles, different sources (scraped online, collected locally, different cameras) etc.
  • Label consistency. All instances of all classes in all images must be labelled. Partial labelling will not work.
  • Label accuracy. Labels must closely enclose each object. No space should exist between an object and it's bounding box. No objects should be missing a label.
  • Background images. Background images are images with no objects that are added to a dataset to reduce False Positives (FP). We recommend about 0-10% background images to help reduce FPs (COCO has 1000 background images for reference, 1% of the total).

COCO Analysis

Model Selection

Larger models like YOLOv5x will produce better results in nearly all cases, but have more parameters and are slower to run. For mobile applications we recommend YOLOv5s/m, for cloud or desktop applications we recommend YOLOv5l/x. See our README table for a full comparison of all models.

To start training from pretrained weights simply pass the name of the model to the --weights argument. Models download automatically from the latest YOLOv5 release.

python train.py --data custom.yaml --weights yolov5s.pt
                                             yolov5m.pt
                                             yolov5l.pt
                                             yolov5x.pt

YOLOv5 Models

Training Settings

Before modifying anything, first train with default settings to establish a performance baseline. A full list of train.py settings can be found in the train.py argparser.

  • Epochs. Start with 300 epochs. If this overfits early then you can reduce epochs. If overfitting does not occur after 300 epochs, train longer, i.e. 600, 1200 etc epochs.
  • Image size. COCO trains at native resolution of --img 640, though due to the high amount of small objects in the dataset it can benefit from training at higher resolutions such as --img 1280. If there are many small objects then custom datasets will benefit from training at native or higher resolution. Best inference results are obtained at the same --img as the training was run at, i.e. if you train at --img 1280 you should also test and detect at --img 1280.
  • Batch size. Use the largest --batch-size that your hardware allows for. Small batch sizes produce poor batchnorm statistics and should be avoided.
  • Hyperparameters. Default hyperparameters are in hyp.scratch.yaml. We recommend you train with default hyperparameters first before thinking of modifying any. In general, increasing augmentation hyperparameters will reduce and delay overfitting, allowing for longer trainings and higher final mAP. Reduction in loss component gain hyperparameters like hyp['obj'] will help reduce overfitting in those specific loss components. For an automated method of optimizing these hyperparameters, see our Hyperparameter Evolution Tutorial.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 2, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as completed Apr 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested Stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants