[develop]: Merge relevant release documentation updates into develop

[gspetro-NOAA]

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:

A variety of updates to the release v2.2.0 documentation are relevant to the develop branch and are being incorporated via this PR.

Type of change

• This change requires a documentation update

TESTS CONDUCTED:

None required. Docs for my fork can be viewed at: https://srw-ug.readthedocs.io/en/text-cleanup/index.html

• hera.intel
• orion.intel
• hercules.intel
• cheyenne.intel
• cheyenne.gnu
• derecho.intel
• gaea.intel
• gaeac5.intel
• jet.intel
• wcoss2.intel
• NOAA Cloud (indicate which platform)
• Jenkins
• fundamental test suite
• comprehensive tests (specify which if a subset was used)

DEPENDENCIES:

None.

DOCUMENTATION:

All documentation.

ISSUE:

Fixes #962 .

CHECKLIST

• My code follows the style guidelines in the Contributor's Guide
• I have performed a self-review of my own code using the Code Reviewer's Guide
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• My changes need updates to the documentation. I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes do not require updates to the documentation (explain). N/A
• My changes generate no new warnings
• New and existing tests pass with my changes N/A - no tests required for doc changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published

CONTRIBUTORS (optional):

@natalie-perlin

[MichaelLueken]

@gspetro-NOAA - The modifications that you made in the tables/Test.csv file in PR #950 should also be applied to this PR's documentation update as well.

The FV3_GFS_2017_gfdlmp CCPP suite has been removed, so the grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_2017_gfdlmp WE2E test should be renamed as done in #950. Additionally, the grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v16 WE2E test was renamed to grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v16_plot.

[gsketefian]

I just have that minor issue regarding

at the grid point in equation --> at the grid point in *question*

but otherwise looks good. Approving.

[MichaelLueken]

Thank you @JeffBeck-NOAA, @gsketefian, and @mkavulich for reviewing and working with @gspetro-NOAA on these updates! Moving forward with merging this PR now.