Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why regression head wasn't normalized ? #395

Open
RocketFlash opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Why regression head wasn't normalized ? #395

RocketFlash opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@RocketFlash
Copy link

Thank you for the amazing work! In the last FCOS model update, you divided regression head predictions by the FPN level stride value. However, why not divide regression predictions by the image size instead? In this case, all values would still be positive, and it would be possible to use a sigmoid activation at the regression output. I assume you did this intentionally, so I would like to understand the reasoning behind it.

@RocketFlash RocketFlash changed the title Why regression head wasn't normilized ? Why regression head wasn't normalized ? Dec 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant