Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

in the resnext block, why the [1, 1] convolution has stride>1, where [3, 3] has stride 1, the downsample is realized by [3, 3] convolution with stride=2 in resnet #12

Open
hejiemath opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@hejiemath
Copy link

No description provided.

@hejiemath
Copy link
Author

I think the place of stride get the opposite way

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant