Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(wip): implement next-auth for expo #133

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

juliusmarminge
Copy link
Member

@juliusmarminge juliusmarminge commented Jan 28, 2023

MOVED TO #720

DRAFT THAT WILL BE UPSTREAMED TO AUTH.JS ONCE THEY HAVE MIGRATED

Hot reload of the session is a bit meh still but this is a POC.

I also don't have an Apple Developer Subscription so I can't test the native provider.

Demo: https://cln.sh/G5CwgW0Z

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 28, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
create-t3-turbo ❌ Failed (Inspect) Jan 28, 2023 at 11:59AM (UTC)

@juliusmarminge juliusmarminge changed the title feat: implement next-auth for expo feat(wip): implement next-auth for expo Jan 28, 2023
@curiosbasant
Copy link

What's the update on this?

@juliusmarminge
Copy link
Member Author

What's the update on this?

Waiting for @authjs/next

@@ -28,10 +52,14 @@ const defineConfig = (_ctx: ConfigContext): ExpoConfig => ({
},
extra: {
eas: {
projectId: "your-project-id",
projectId: "768478b6-46cd-43a3-904b-f4d5065648d2",
Copy link

@ItsWendell ItsWendell Mar 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be removed

@lmssiehdev
Copy link

will this be easier to implement with https://lucia-auth.com?

@dBianchii
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, we're still waiting for @authjs/next?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants