Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(rfq-relayer): update rebalancing documentation #3103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dwasse
Copy link
Collaborator

@dwasse dwasse commented Sep 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced documentation on the automated rebalancing process for the relayer system.
    • Added detailed explanations of key concepts such as 'total balance' and 'maintenance threshold.'
    • Clarified the rebalance calculation process with an illustrative example for better user understanding.

cc312b7: docs preview link

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the documentation of the relayer system's automated rebalancing process. Key additions include definitions of 'total balance' and 'maintenance threshold', and a detailed explanation of the rebalance logic. The documentation now specifies that only one rebalance can be pending per token and clarifies how to calculate the rebalance amount, including thresholds and limits. An illustrative example demonstrates the rebalancing mechanics across multiple chains.

Changes

Files Change Summary
docs/bridge/docs/rfq/Relayer/Relayer.md Expanded explanation of the automated rebalancing process, including definitions of 'total balance' and 'maintenance threshold'. Clarified rebalance calculation logic and provided an illustrative example.

Poem

In the fields where balances sway,
A relayer hops, rebalancing the way.
With thresholds set and logic clear,
One rebalance at a time, oh dear!
Hopping through chains, all in a row,
Making sure our tokens flow! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
docs/bridge/docs/rfq/Relayer/Relayer.md (1)

30-52: Add Definitions or Links for Technical Terms

The terms "total balance" and "maintenance threshold" are used in the documentation without accompanying definitions or links to definitions. To improve clarity and ensure that all readers can understand the content, consider adding definitions or links for these terms.

  • Lines 30-31: Define or link "total balance" and "maintenance threshold" to their respective definitions.
Analysis chain

Review of the Rebalancing Section

The rebalancing section has been significantly expanded and now includes detailed explanations of the logic and steps involved in evaluating rebalances for supported tokens. The definitions of 'total balance' and 'maintenance threshold' are crucial additions that enhance understanding. The process for calculating the rebalance amount is clearly outlined, and the example provided is practical and illustrative.

Suggestions:

  • Ensure that all technical terms used are defined or linked to their definitions elsewhere in the documentation to aid in reader comprehension.
  • Verify that the example balances and thresholds are consistent with realistic scenarios or past data to maintain credibility.

Grammar Correction:

  • Line 49 contains a grammatical error. The phrase "would be initially be targeted" should be corrected to "would initially be targeted."
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all technical terms are defined or linked to their definitions.

# Test: Search for technical terms and check for definitions or links.
rg --type markdown -A 5 $'total balance|maintenance threshold'

Length of output: 1964

Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~49-~49: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ...The rebalance amount would be initially be targeted as 600 since this would take c...

(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 715269a and 6ebcae1.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/bridge/docs/rfq/Relayer/Relayer.md (1 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
docs/bridge/docs/rfq/Relayer/Relayer.md

[uncategorized] ~49-~49: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ...The rebalance amount would be initially be targeted as 600 since this would take c...

(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 23.18MB ⬆️

Bundle name Size Change
sdk-router-@synapsecns/sdk-router-cjs* 527.05kB 409.81kB ⬆️
docs-bridge-client-array-push 7.9MB 7.9MB ⬆️
docs-bridge-server-cjs 14.87MB 14.87MB ⬆️

ℹ️ *Bundle size includes cached data from a previous commit

Copy link

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 6ebcae1
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://3c2535df.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://docs-rebalance.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

@dwasse dwasse merged commit ebc1577 into master Sep 5, 2024
30 checks passed
@dwasse dwasse deleted the docs/rebalance branch September 5, 2024 19:49
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants