Add tracing in inventory manager

[dwasse]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Updated HasSufficientGas method to enhance traceability and improve context management.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update introduces an enhancement to the HasSufficientGas method within the inventoryManagerImpl structure, focusing on improved context management and tracing capabilities. By accepting a parentCtx parameter, it allows for more flexible and hierarchical context handling. Furthermore, the addition of tracing logic enriches the method's functionality, enabling the start of a span and the setting of attributes related to gas sufficiency checks, thereby augmenting observability and debugging capabilities.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.../rfq/relayer/inventory/manager.go	Updated HasSufficientGas to accept parentCtx; added tracing logic for gas thresholds and sufficiency.

🐰✨
In the realm of code, where logic intertwines,
A rabbit hopped, leaving traces behind.
"With context anew and tracing so fine,
Our gas checks are clear, as stars that align."
🌟📊
So here's to the changes, both big and small,
Celebrating progress, one hop for us all.
🎉🐾

---

Recent Review Status

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0468e9 and 270a984.

Files selected for processing (1)

• services/rfq/relayer/inventory/manager.go (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (4)

services/rfq/relayer/inventory/manager.go (4)

365-379: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [368-396]

Consider adding error handling for the tracing span creation.

While the tracing span creation with i.handler.Tracer().Start(parentCtx, "HasSufficientGas", trace.WithAttributes(...)) is crucial for observability, it's also important to consider scenarios where span creation might fail. Adding error handling for the span creation can prevent potential issues in tracing setup and ensure more robust observability.

---

365-379: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [368-396]

Validate origin and dest chain IDs before proceeding with balance checks.

Before proceeding with the gas threshold and balance checks, it would be beneficial to validate the origin and dest chain IDs. This validation can help ensure that the method operates on valid and supported chain IDs, potentially avoiding unnecessary operations or errors in scenarios where invalid chain IDs are provided.

---

365-379: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [368-396]

Optimize the retrieval of committable balances for origin and destination.

The current implementation calls i.GetCommittableBalance(ctx, origin, chain.EthAddress) and i.GetCommittableBalance(ctx, dest, chain.EthAddress) sequentially for both the origin and destination. If these operations are independent and do not modify shared state, consider parallelizing them to improve performance, especially in scenarios where balance retrieval might be a time-consuming operation.

---

365-379: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [368-396]

Ensure consistent error messages for better debugging and observability.

The error messages returned in this method vary slightly in their structure, e.g., "error getting min gas token" vs. "error getting committable gas on origin". For consistency and easier debugging, consider standardizing the format of error messages throughout the method. A consistent format helps in quickly identifying the type of error and the operation that failed.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying sanguine-fe with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	270a984
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://c9fb0331.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://feat-inv-tracing.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 14 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 46.89582%. Comparing base (b0468e9) to head (270a984).

Files	Patch %	Lines
services/rfq/relayer/inventory/manager.go	0.00000%	14 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##              master       #2476         +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage   47.05106%   46.89582%   -0.15524%     
===================================================
  Files            388         384          -4     
  Lines          29536       29412        -124     
  Branches          83          83                 
===================================================
- Hits           13897       13793        -104     
+ Misses         14192       14176         -16     
+ Partials        1447        1443          -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
promexporter	?
rfq	28.84118% <0.00000%> (-0.09732%)	⬇️
stiprelayer	3.33333% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.