Deploy new RFQ Contracts, update script to respond to Ctrl + C, add G… #2255
Conversation
…overnor Role to deploy script
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@trajan0x has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent updates introduce a new Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://github.com/avatars/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Files selected for processing (10)
- packages/contracts-rfq/configs/global/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arbitrum/.chainId (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arbitrum/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/mainnet/.chainId (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/mainnet/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/optimism/.chainId (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/optimism/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/script/ConfigureFastBridge.s.sol (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/script/fb-config.sh (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/script/fb-deploy.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arbitrum/.chainId
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/mainnet/.chainId
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/optimism/.chainId
Additional comments: 5
packages/contracts-rfq/configs/global/FastBridge.json (1)
- 6-7: The addition of the
governorsentity in theFastBridge.jsonconfiguration file is a significant update that expands the governance capabilities of the FastBridge contracts. Ensure that this addition aligns with the intended governance model and has been thoroughly reviewed for security implications.packages/contracts-rfq/script/ConfigureFastBridge.s.sol (1)
- 18-18: The addition of the governor role synchronization within the
runfunction ofConfigureFastBridge.s.solis a significant update that aligns with the PR's objectives to expand governance capabilities. Ensure that the role ID used (fastBridge.GOVERNOR_ROLE()) correctly matches the intended governance role and that the role synchronization process has been thoroughly reviewed for security implications.packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/mainnet/FastBridge.json (1)
- 1-1223: This deployment artifact for the FastBridge contract on mainnet appears comprehensive, including the contract address, constructor arguments, receipt details, and the ABI. Ensure that the deployment details and ABI accurately reflect the actual deployed contract, especially in light of the PR's objectives, such as the addition of the governor role.
packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arbitrum/FastBridge.json (1)
- 1-1223: The JSON file appears to be well-structured and correctly formatted, representing the ABI (Application Binary Interface) of the FastBridge smart contract along with deployment details such as the contract address, constructor arguments, and transaction receipt. Here are some specific observations and recommendations:
Contract Address and Constructor Arguments: Ensure that the contract address (
0x5523D3c98809DdDB82C686E152F5C58B1B0fB59E) and constructor arguments are correct and correspond to the intended deployment on the Arbitrum network. It's crucial that these values are double-checked to prevent any issues related to interacting with the wrong contract instance.Receipt Details: The transaction receipt includes the transaction hash and block number. Verify that these details accurately reflect the transaction that deployed the contract. This information is essential for auditing and tracking the deployment history.
ABI Completeness: The ABI provided is extensive and covers a wide range of functions, events, and errors. It's important to ensure that the ABI matches the latest version of the compiled contract. Any discrepancies between the ABI and the actual contract code could lead to failed transactions or incorrect interactions with the contract.
Security Considerations: Given the sensitive nature of smart contracts, especially those involved in bridging and financial transactions, it's critical to ensure that all roles and permissions are correctly configured. Pay particular attention to roles like
GOVERNOR_ROLE,GUARD_ROLE, andRELAYER_ROLEto ensure they are assigned to the appropriate addresses and that their permissions align with the intended governance model.Event and Error Definitions: The events and errors defined in the ABI should be reviewed to ensure they cover all necessary scenarios. This includes successful operations, common errors, and edge cases. Properly defined events and errors are crucial for monitoring contract behavior and diagnosing issues.
Overall, the JSON file seems to be in good order. However, due to the critical nature of smart contracts and the irreversible consequences of errors, it's recommended to conduct a thorough audit and testing of the contract and its deployment configuration before finalizing the deployment.
packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/optimism/FastBridge.json (1)
- 1-1223: The JSON file appears to be well-structured and contains a comprehensive ABI for the FastBridge smart contract, along with deployment details such as the contract address, constructor arguments, and transaction receipt. The ABI includes a wide range of functions and events that cover various aspects of the contract's functionality, including role management, transaction bridging, dispute handling, and fee management.
It's important to ensure that the contract address (
0x5523D3c98809DdDB82C686E152F5C58B1B0fB59E) and constructor arguments are correct and correspond to the intended deployment on the Optimism network. Additionally, the transaction receipt details, such as the transaction hash and block number, should be verified for accuracy.The ABI definitions are extensive and seem to cover all necessary functions and events for the FastBridge contract's operation. It includes role-based access control, transaction bridging and relaying, fee management, and error handling through custom error types. Each function and event is clearly defined with input and output parameters, making it easier for developers to interact with the contract.
Overall, the file meets the objectives outlined in the PR description by providing the necessary infrastructure for deploying and interacting with the FastBridge smart contracts on the Optimism network. However, it's crucial to perform additional validations, such as verifying the contract address and constructor arguments against deployment records and testing the contract interactions based on the ABI definitions to ensure everything functions as expected.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2255 +/- ##
===================================================
- Coverage 47.91251% 47.91074% -0.00178%
===================================================
Files 366 366
Lines 27066 27067 +1
Branches 132 132
===================================================
Hits 12968 12968
- Misses 12757 12758 +1
Partials 1341 1341
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Deploying with
|
| Latest commit: |
74ebb79
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://743f3229.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://rfq-deploy-new.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…overnor Role to deploy script
Description
A clear and concise description of the features you're adding in this pull request.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem you're solving.
Metadata
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
governorsentity.Chores