added result yaml and xml from example code

[OskarStark]

No description provided.

[wouterj]

Shouldn't we also add an XML example? (we can help with creating the example if you need help)

[OskarStark]

Will do after holiday

Greetings from turkey ;)

[OskarStark]

done @wouterj

btw. why is database-key not used in the xml??

[wouterj]

should be <database>

[OskarStark]

yes should, but i executed this code from the doc and this was the result.

[OskarStark]

any idea? @javiereguiluz @xabbuh

[wouterj]

The root element is replaced by <config> when using configuration in a DI extension. However, this is about using config standalone, in which case the root element is just used (so <database>).

[OskarStark]

shall i add another key on top so he result uses database and the remove the config node?

[wouterj]

no, we are talking about config usage standalone and not inside a DI extension in this article. so you should just replace the <config> element with <database>.

[OskarStark]

ah ok, sorry i missunderstood you

[OskarStark]

done @wouterj

[OskarStark]

if i could do anything else, please let me know.

[xabbuh]

Is there a reason not to wrap the two code blocks in a configuration block?

[OskarStark]

i did this because of the different highlighting.

[xabbuh]

What do you mean with different highlighting? I mean we should not put both examples in one code-block directive, but we can wrap both code blocks in one configuration block like this:

.. configuration-block::

    .. code-block:: yaml

        # ...

    .. code-block:: xml

        <!-- ... -->

[OskarStark]

oh nice, will have a look at it 👍

[OskarStark]

updated @xabbuh

[xabbuh]

👍

[wouterj]

👍

[wouterj]

Thank you Oskar for your work on this one!

[OskarStark]

👍 thank you for the review time ;-)