Bump 3.13 to non dev

[patrick91]

Doing this PR to also check why tests in #3639 are broken

Summary by Sourcery

Update the testing configuration to use Python 3.13 instead of the development version 3.13-dev in both the GitHub Actions workflow and Nox test sessions.

CI:

• Update the GitHub Actions workflow to use Python 3.13 instead of 3.13-dev for testing.

Tests:

• Modify the Nox configuration to include Python 3.13 in the Django test sessions, replacing Python 3.11.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the Python version from 3.13-dev to 3.13 in the GitHub Actions workflow and adjusts the Django tests to run on Python 3.12 and 3.13 instead of 3.11 and 3.12. These changes likely aim to use the latest stable version of Python 3.13 and update the testing matrix accordingly.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update Python version from 3.13-dev to 3.13 in GitHub Actions workflow	Replace '3.13-dev' with '3.13' in the Python versions list	.github/workflows/test.yml
Modify Django tests to run on Python 3.12 and 3.13	Change Python versions for Django tests from '["3.11", "3.12"]' to '["3.12", "3.13"]'	noxfile.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @patrick91 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.93%. Comparing base (0bc9773) to head (0aa763d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3665      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.67%   96.93%   +0.26%     
==========================================
  Files         504      504              
  Lines       33448    33448              
  Branches     5600     5600              
==========================================
+ Hits        32335    32423      +88     
+ Misses        880      793      -87     
+ Partials      233      232       -1     

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3665 will not alter performance

_{Comparing py313 (0aa763d) with main (0bc9773)}

Summary

✅ 15 untouched benchmarks

[bellini666]

I think we can't run Django 4.0 and 3.2 tests with 3.13 as they use the cgi module, which was deprecated and got removed.