Fix missing return annotation in get_customer docs

[Skeen]

Description

The example under: "Defining extra types when using Interfaces" on https://strawberry.rocks/docs/types/schema contains an example, which does not run.

Using the documentation as-is produces this error:

MissingReturnAnnotationError: Return annotation missing for field "get_customer", did you forget to add it?

Types of Changes

• Core
• Bugfix
• New feature
• Enhancement/optimization
• Documentation

Issues Fixed or Closed by This PR

Checklist

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

Summary by Sourcery

Correct the return annotation in the 'get_customer' function example in the documentation to prevent runtime errors and improve clarity.

Documentation:

• Fix the missing return annotation in the 'get_customer' function example in the documentation to ensure it runs without errors.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request fixes a missing return annotation in the documentation example for the get_customer method. The change addresses an error that users would encounter when trying to run the example as-is from the documentation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added missing return annotation to the get_customer method example	Added -> Customer as the return type annotation for the get_customer method Removed the commented-out return type annotation	docs/types/schema.md

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @Skeen - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[DoctorJohn]

Nice, thanks you very much @Skeen