Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: allow eslint-plugin-promise v5 as peer dependency #186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2021
Merged

fix: allow eslint-plugin-promise v5 as peer dependency #186

merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2021

Conversation

erezrokah
Copy link
Contributor

Allow eslint-plugin-promise v5 as peer dependency.

Fixes the following use case netlify/eslint-config-node#160 (comment) and extracted from #183 to separate concerns.

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented May 24, 2021

🙌 Thanks for opening this pull request! You're awesome.

Copy link
Member

@LinusU LinusU left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@erezrokah erezrokah mentioned this pull request May 24, 2021
@erezrokah erezrokah closed this May 24, 2021
@theoludwig
Copy link
Member

Could you explain, why are you not willing to merge #183 instead ? @LinusU

@erezrokah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing per #183 (comment)

@voxpelli
Copy link
Member

I prefer this PR @divlo since, as I've argued before, this is the minimal change for fixing the problem of eg. @erezrokah.

#183 contains additional changes that are not needed for this very fix and which are possible to object to.

@erezrokah erezrokah reopened this May 24, 2021
@theoludwig theoludwig merged commit 8fdbb45 into standard:master May 24, 2021
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented May 24, 2021

🎉 Congrats on getting your first pull request landed!

@LinusU
Copy link
Member

LinusU commented May 24, 2021

Could you explain, why are you not willing to merge #183 instead ? @LinusU

This happened to be at the top of my inbox so I looked at the small change and approved it 😅

Unfortunately I don't have time to read thru #183 right now, but my take in just quickly glancing at the changes (sorry if this has been discussed) is that it's always easier to merge smaller PRs ☺️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants