[c++] Propagate Python/R function names to C++ for upgrade/resize methods

[johnkerl]

Issue and/or context: As tracked on issue #2407 / [sc-51048].

Changes:

• This is underpinning for [python] New-shape testing for tiledbsoma.io [WIP] #2964
• As @nguyenv pointed out, it might be nice for the C++ layer to just return enums only ...
• ... but as I pointed out
  • informative messages really require specific context such as the user-provided shape and the limit it ran into
  • I don't want to write those all twice in Python and R
  • So we are making user-presentable strings in the C++ code
• That said, we should not be hard-coding the function names from the caller -- given that C++ is creating user-facing error strings on behalf of Python and R, the C++ code should enable and empower the Python/R code to pass in their function names (whatever those are)

Notes for Reviewer:

Despite the line-count this is a trivial PR. I'm splitting out this PR (as well as recents #3125 #3127 #3130) in order to clear the picture for #2964 which is the contentful goal of my recent work this week.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.60%. Comparing base (47f6b73) to head (9b54d0a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3130      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.49%   82.60%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        5204     5204              
==========================================
+ Hits         4293     4299       +6     
+ Misses        911      905       -6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
python	82.60% <ø> (+0.11%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
python_api	82.60% <ø> (+0.11%)	⬆️
libtiledbsoma	∅ <ø> (∅)

[johnkerl]

Thanks @nguyenv !