Make the second argument to RequireAllOrNone optional

[roryabraham]

Minor suggestion for an enhancement - make the second argument to RequireAllOrNone optional:

i.e: RequireAllOrNone<MyType> would be functionally equivalent to RequireAllOrNone<MyType, keyof MyType>

Upvote & Fund

• We're using Polar.sh so you can upvote and help fund this issue.
• The funding will be given to active contributors.
• Thank you in advance for helping prioritize & fund our backlog.

[sindresorhus]

Makes sense to me.

@tommy-mitchell Any reason you went with never? I noticed you used key T in your issue: #652 (comment)

[tommy-mitchell]

I didn't add the never constraint, that was introduced when RequireAllOrNone was created in #254.

We're just inconsistent in general with our RequireX types - some have an optional second parameter, others don't. I think all of them should, personally.

[sindresorhus]

Alright. Let's do it.

[roryabraham]

Thanks all! 🚀