Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/zenko 596 add redis ha option #174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2018

Conversation

ssalaues
Copy link
Contributor

@ssalaues ssalaues commented Jul 6, 2018

No description provided.

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ spec:
- name: EXTENSIONS_REPLICATION_SOURCE_S3_PORT
value: "80"
- name: REDIS_HOST
value: "{{- printf "%s-%s" .Release.Name "redis" | trunc 63 | trimSuffix "-" -}}"
value: "{{- printf "%s-%s" .Release.Name "redis-ha-master-svc" | trunc 63 | trimSuffix "-" -}}"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't change Backbeat, this breaks compatibility. Backbeat only writes to LocalCache atm.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ssalaues ssalaues Jul 6, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added this because all of the other backbeat services are configured to use redis-ha and to make it uniform/prevent issues. If they all should be on localcache then we should make that change as well.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just saw that #160 switched all the backbeat redis to use the local cache (my branch was out of date). I'll drop this commit.

@ssalaues ssalaues force-pushed the feature/ZENKO-596-add-redis-ha-option branch from 663e5cc to d93feb8 Compare July 6, 2018 18:24
@ssalaues ssalaues merged commit fe945ff into master Jul 6, 2018
@ssalaues ssalaues deleted the feature/ZENKO-596-add-redis-ha-option branch July 6, 2018 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants