Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possibly improve the err.stash(...)ing API's macro friendliness #70069

Open
Centril opened this issue Mar 17, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Possibly improve the err.stash(...)ing API's macro friendliness #70069

Centril opened this issue Mar 17, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-macros Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..) C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. P-low Low priority T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Mar 17, 2020

E.g. consider implementing #69537 (comment) at some point. Right now, we will allow overwriting a stashed diagnostic, so when combined with macros, the diagnostics after the first one will be of worse quality.

@Centril Centril added C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-macros Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. P-low Low priority labels Mar 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-macros Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..) C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. P-low Low priority T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant